IRAN ON EDGE , Massive protests erupt , Casualties Reported

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tell that to all the Uyghurs in concentration camps
Well that's very responsive of China.
But again, That's a case of brutality that's seprate from life experience of most of the chinese civilian under its rule, with that said your country is also on its way to become a post democratic/electoral authoritarian nation, both can finally associate with each other.

As for Singapore

it functions as a de facto dominant-party system where the People's Action Party (PAP) has held power since 1959, leading many to label it an "illiberal democracy" or "soft authoritarian" state, balancing strong governance with restricted civil liberties.

And
One comment by Russia doesn't change what I've seen for 4 years.
Well, You're a single human,not the judge with jurisdiction on how Indian civilians should act & your experience is not a topic of conversation, it was about current situation in Iran and actors/meddlers responsible for it, and you trying to expand the topic dodge the action of US, even when its one of the two prime actors , and the originator of the chain of the events, and even after 1971 continued to act/meddle negatively IN Iran's affairs continously.



More the reason for secondary sanctions on India.
Europe doesn't wanna loose the supply of refined oil and further worsen its inflation and stressed economy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Aniruddha
Well that's very responsive of China.
But again, That's a case of brutality that's seprate from life experience of most of the chinese civilian under its rule, with that said your country is also on its way to become a post democratic/electoral authoritarian nation, both can finally associate with each other.
The same as it was for Jews during WWII. The UK is on its way to becoming authoritarian?
As for Singapore

it functions as a de facto dominant-party system where the People's Action Party (PAP) has held power since 1959, leading many to label it an "illiberal democracy" or "soft authoritarian" state, balancing strong governance with restricted civil liberties.
Well that's not how official sites see it.
And

Well, You're a single human,not the judge with jurisdiction on how Indian civilians should act & your experience is not a topic of conversation, it was about current situation in Iran and actors/meddlers responsible for it, and you trying to expand the topic dodge the action of US, even when its one of the two prime actors , and the originator of the chain of the events, and even after 1971 continued to act/meddle negatively IN Iran's affairs continously.
It's apparent to anyone watching that India is rooting for Russia. It was 1979, and in no way did US activities force Iranian police to batter women to death for net wearing a head-scarf. You're trying to extrapolate US actions to explain things they just can't. It's a brutal, regressive and repressive regime. That's entirely on Iran's regime. If I tried explain India's relative democracy in a regime not known for it as being down to British occupation, I'm sure you'd tell me I was talking horseshit. Well, you can't have it both ways. Either current actions are down to current regimes, or they're all explained by mid-20th century BS.
Europe doesn't wanna loose the supply of refined oil and further worsen its inflation and stressed economy.
Some countries in Europe don't but they will have to.

As regards your other news articles:

1. Trump is an idiot.
2. Reporting antisemetism in a negative light is right surely??
 
So how many Iranians is little britain willing to take in considering both little britain & its citizens are such doughty warriors of human rights & democracy , Paddy ?

Also fits in with the agenda of the party in labour of being such strong supporters of Islam across the world that they wish to accommodate as many as they can in little britain . It also helps if these groups then vote for the party in labour .

Alternatively I'm sure the Republic of Paddyland would love to take them in for the simple reason if things go south , you can't exactly blame the Paddys there for not thinking this through !
 

Do you think the party in labour will confiscate these assets Paddy ? I don't doubt it in the slightest. After all ill gotten wealth is like mother's milk to little britain . That's the reason you had the British Pimpire.

Which raises an important question how did these Iranians amass such assets in the west in spite of being heavily sanctioned since 1979 ?

Or is this further evidence of Londonistan being the haven of undocumented income from across the world ? @BMD
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironhide

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Sunday (February 1, 2026) warned that any U.S. strike on the country would become a regional war even as Tehran and Washington confirmed that talks are progressing between the two sides amid regional efforts to de-escalate tensions.
 

China has emerged as a key player in Iran's escalating confrontation with the United States, as mass protests and economic collapse strain the Islamic Republic from within.

In early January, widespread demonstrations driven by economic hardship, political discontent and sustained foreign pressure posed one of the most serious domestic challenges Iran's leadership has faced in years.

The unrest soon gave way to a sharpening regional standoff, as President Donald Trump ordered large US military deployments to the Middle East and issued warnings demanding that Iran curb its nuclear program and ballistic missile development.

During the protests, China reportedly assisted Iranian authorities in implementing a nationwide communications blackout.

On January 15, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi also condemned US threats as a return to the "law of the jungle," contrasting what he described as American aggression with China's offer to play a "constructive role" in helping the Iranian government and people "stand united."

On Saturday, January 31, amid heightened tensions with Washington, Iranian state media reported that Iran plans to hold joint naval exercises with China and Russia in mid-February in the northern Indian Ocean.

The announcement was followed by a surge of unconfirmed claims online alleging that China was supplying military assistance to Iran, as well as speculations over whether the Chinese government would intervene in the event of a US military confrontation.
 
venezuela 2.0? i mean its not going to be another desert storm with irans military capability being either very old or severely degraded. They might put up more of a fight compared to venezuela although even that is uncertain with the massive amounts of protests going on rn.
Iran seems more willing to end its nuclear program at the moment but it would need to agree to a supervised dismantling of the underground facility at Natanz as part of any deal.
 
US President Donald Trump said Tuesday in an interview with Axios that he’s considering sending a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East in case negotiations with Iran fail.

"Either we will make a deal or we will have to do something very tough like last time," Trump told Axios.

"We have an armada that is heading there and another one might be going," Trump said.

He added that he’s “thinking” of sending another aircraft carrier strike group.

Iran "wants to make a deal very badly…Last time they didn't believe I would do it," Trump said, referring to the talks that preceded the 12-day war with ‘Israel’, in which the United States struck Iranian nuclear sites.


 
Seems there are some results. Let's see what ends up happening.


“Finally, we were able to reach an agreement on a set of guiding principles based on which we will move forward and discuss the text of a potential deal,” said Mr. Araghchi. He, however, added that reaching a final agreement may not be immediate, noting that technical work on the text would be complex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spice

Speaking on the eve of high-level negotiations in Muscat, Oman, Leavitt emphasized that the President is consulting closely with his national security team to pursue a deal that achieves "zero nuclear capability" for the Iranian regime. However, she paired this diplomatic overture with a firm reminder of American strength, stating that it would be "wise" for Tehran to negotiate now, as the President maintains a full range of military and strategic options as Commander-in-Chief.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.