So what ... The score is 5:
Waiting for the ecosystem to activate and shed tears for her
Azaad mulk ke ho ya Arabi Ghulam ? It takes a really thick skin to be as nonchalant about this important fact as you put it , describing an important air base in your country as being the private fiefdom of some camel phuckers .This Rahim Yar Khan airport induans are so happy about, is a private airport is called Sheikh Zayed airport for a reason..
Its used by UAE royal family for their private hunting trips to the area.
Was built by them, and has no defence and security significance.
I am not sure why india even targeted this airport, and achieved what ?
This airport doesn't even have any air defences and won't have.
I was of the opinion that India didn't have the longest range S 400 missile as in the India Pakistan scenario shooting anything at 400km away doesn't make sense.I guess the drone part has been aptly fact-checked by people in the thread, so I don't need to say much, but I have to commend you the fruit doesn't fall far from the true top tier misinformation (Typical DG ISPR tactics). Now to the multiple videos on Dinga as mentioned before there are variety of claims and variety of videos however, nothing exaclty has come out on the ground as to what exactly was shot down as only 40N6E remnants have been photographed which i posted before. So again the question remains what transpired in Dinga
I was of the opinion that India didn't have the longest range S 400 missile as in the India Pakistan scenario shooting anything at 400km away doesn't make sense.
Pakistan is a narrow country. India can deploy air defence assets all along the north south border use shorter range missiles.
Or at least of tge opinion that it's not deployed at Pakistani birder, may be at chinese.
But here we are ,India did fire the longest range S 400 interceptor at Pakistan.
The counter claim is that Pakistan shot it down by LOMADS HQ 16.
I am aware that both sides are good at boasting and stating things that didn't happen.
My question is that is it possible to shoot down a surface to air missile with another surface to air missile?
I was of the opinion that India didn't have the longest range S 400 missile as in the India Pakistan scenario shooting anything at 400km away doesn't make sense.
Pakistan is a narrow country. India can deploy air defence assets all along the north south border use shorter range missiles.
Or at least of tge opinion that it's not deployed at Pakistani birder, may be at chinese.
But here we are ,India did fire the longest range S 400 interceptor at Pakistan.
The counter claim is that Pakistan shot it down by LOMADS HQ 16.
I am aware that both sides are good at boasting and stating things that didn't happen.
My question is that is it possible to shoot down a surface to air missile with another surface to air missile?
Relax > he is a sports journalist
Nothing less than the noose for this thing.
Your Quwa think tank also thinks the same, you can read their report. That is if you are capable of reading.Yeah right. May be in your little sect of Hinduism.
Relax > he is a sports journalist
That's the plan.... The day S400 decides... The entire country is in his range ( horizontally)....I was of the opinion that India didn't have the longest range S 400 missile as in the India Pakistan scenario shooting anything at 400km away doesn't make sense.
Pakistan is a narrow country. India can deploy air defence assets all along the north south border use shorter range missiles.
Or at least of tge opinion that it's not deployed at Pakistani birder, may be at chinese.
But here we are ,India did fire the longest range S 400 interceptor at Pakistan.
The counter claim is that Pakistan shot it down by LOMADS HQ 16.
I am aware that both sides are good at boasting and stating things that didn't happen.
My question is that is it possible to shoot down a surface to air missile with another surface to air missile?


Interesting, more unfavorable views in other third world countries like Brazil, Mexico? Somehow Canada has more favorable perceptions of us? Interesting.Soft power status. A wake up call for the MEA babus who favour good boy behaviour irrespective of the cost. A military operation when needed has to happen unfortunately. The tours pre-op or post-op do little to improve your image. A nation already has an image built. Most countries have an ambivalent stance with only a slight tilt in your favour. Time to give realistic policies a chance.
View attachment 45921
That's why I said - Priorities within the MEA need a re-think. Do look at the patterns exhibited and you'll see they seem to be on a different 'churan' so to speak.However, I don't agree that we should place emphasis on what others "think" of India. We are only beholden to our national interest, not assuaging others opinions of us.
Half the reputation decrease is cause of the psiedo secular indians who like to slave away for whites and get a liberal tag. Their willingness to hide everything good and photoop everything badSoft power status. A wake up call for the MEA babus who favour good boy behaviour irrespective of the cost. A military operation when needed has to happen unfortunately. The tours pre-op or post-op do little to improve your image. A nation already has an image built. Most countries have an ambivalent stance with only a slight tilt in your favour. Time to give realistic policies a chance.
View attachment 45921