Yea I dont think US or even China would give Porks like 10 megaton weapon dudeNothing is impossible if IMF and USA is helping them.

Yea I dont think US or even China would give Porks like 10 megaton weapon dudeNothing is impossible if IMF and USA is helping them.
Water.
If dams don't open , another war will begin pretty soon.
It can go ape s**t because most of the battle planners are from the same areas which will be hardest hit by India not abiding by IWT.
This is actually a mistake that people make without looking into it further.Nothing is impossible if IMF and USA is helping them.
LIkely few Scalp-EGs were intercepted but intercepting BrahMos-A was beyond Pak ADS' capability. They got pounded very bad this time around and they know it. Will they admit it though? Nope. Not in their culture to accept and admit defeat. So no point arguing with people like these, IMO.Where are the wreckage pictures of Brahmos ALCM and Storm Shadow?
Former resident chicom was saying how PLA uses AWACS to detect low flying cruise missiles and connects with their AD to engage and guide them. Even if China possesses such a capability I'm guessing it's still almost impossible to shoot down even most of a Brahmos salvo?LIkely few Scalp-EGs were intercepted but intercepting BrahMos-A was beyond Pak ADS' capability. They got pounded very bad this time around and they know it. Will they admit it though? Nope. Not in their culture to accept and admit defeat. So no point arguing with people like these, IMO.
A strike package that is cleverly timed and used in conjunction with other multiple capabilities will present a "challenging scenario". No AD in the world is equipped to handle every threat (Hype put aside - the have chances in terms of percentages for each aerial threat). Hence, the buzzword "Layering". The Layer has so far proved inadequate so you're mostly correct (the Layer in its current form deployed in Pakistan). We still do not have a real world test of a chinese designed, deployed, and maintained AD Layer(s). Unless the PLAF directly maintains PAF AD networks.Former resident chicom was saying how PLA uses AWACS to detect low flying cruise missiles and connects with their AD to engage and guide them. Even if China possesses such a capability I'm guessing it's still almost impossible to shoot down even most of a Brahmos salvo?
There is no proof of Scalp interceptions by porkee..... The one photo out there show intact Scalp broken due to ground impact but still in somewhat perfect condition...... In all likely crashed due to malfunction.LIkely few Scalp-EGs were intercepted but intercepting BrahMos-A was beyond Pak ADS' capability. They got pounded very bad this time around and they know it. Will they admit it though? Nope. Not in their culture to accept and admit defeat. So no point arguing with people like these, IMO.
The story floated is that there were "soft kills" used against Indian ALCMs. The veracity of this is currently unknown and will likely be in that state perhaps forever.There is no proof of Scalp interceptions by porkee..... The one photo out there show intact Scalp broken due to ground impact but still in somewhat perfect condition...... In all likely crashed due to malfunction.
Russia intercepted the majority of Storm shadow/Scalp missiles fired by Ukraine - there are reasonably credible figures.There is no proof of Scalp interceptions by porkee..... The one photo out there show intact Scalp broken due to ground impact but still in somewhat perfect condition...... In all likely crashed due to malfunction.
No they didn't.... Russians made lot of claims that it.Russia intercepted the majority of Storm shadow/Scalp missiles fired by Ukraine - there are reasonably credible figures.
However, Russia has more time to prepare (they know when the aircraft takes off) and a better AD than Pak (Plantsir, then S-300 or 400).
That said, I'd except Pak to intercept some Scalp, but have lower success against the faster Brahmos.
Our DM gave an open threat, if you have spine give provocation.You have a point. But let's leave it as it is.
I will join you guys in some other discussions.
![]()
By showing evidence of shooting down 6x IAF jets and 1x High altitude UAV, by using actual fighter jets. Not like India who was reduced to playing drone drone like Yemen against Israel and Ukraine against Russia.
Plus all the airbases India claims to have "Destroyed" are within public view ,cand people can see what's destroyed and what's not
Nur khan attack was Storm Shadow. 2x .
Missed target. At least one was found on public road near the base
Rafiqui in Shorkot and Shahbaz in Bholari, were Brahmos attacks.
Total distance from launcher to targets was less than 300 km .
At Mach 3 the missile reached target in less than 5 minutes.
The bases are still there , and operational and the little damage is repairable.
That's an achievement on its own, defending in such a short response time.
Again a crap load of BS form you, if you were following russia Ukraine war, you would have known by now the reason for absymal performance of Russian AD unit's, is the lack of modernise layered air defence systems is one of the key reasons for such performance of Russian AD systems, on the other hand nato has NATINAMDS and Indian have IACCS, which is absent in the russian case,Well, what can I say? People always have to come up with some reasons to declare their victory, don't they? Why don't you go and take a look at the battlefield in Ukraine? Has Russia defended against every attack from Ukraine? The number of Russia's advanced anti-aircraft missiles is 30 times that of Pakistan, but he still has too many problems.
Dude still They haven't repaired the some of the runways yet, the sargodha air base was still ongoing repair at one junction and another one they didn't even have touched it on may 12, that's more than 48 hours, even if you let the enemy give a 12 hour window period or 8/10 you are a dead man, the second strikes doesn't take too long to do Even more damages, now it doesn't take 50 missiles to destroy reinforcement bunkers, orshenik demonstrated it, how a single missile can do a significant damage and how Deep it can penetrate, the high speed missile have greater kinetic energy, it doesn't need 50 missiles, and stop creating your imaginary conversation of f15ex, typhoon, pac 3I don't know how to translate.赢学,It might be translated as Copium
Your way of thinking is typical of the military ideology of poor third-world countries. When the Rafale was shot down, you simply bought the Typhoon, F15EX, or other fighter jets. You don't understand how modern air combat is fought.
Similarly, if HQ9 cannot defend against all of India's attacks, then purchase PAC-3 or S400. Air defense operations are not conducted this way. Coordinated operations are what matter
Eleven air bases were attacked. As I saw it, most of them only had 1 to 3 bullet holes. According to NATO's perspective, to completely paralyze an air base, at least 20 missiles are needed. If one wants to accurately destroy reinforced bunkers, at least 50 missiles are required. The Indian attack had more symbolic significance.
Power.Water.
If dams don't open , another war will begin pretty soon.
It can go ape s**t because most of the battle planners are from the same areas which will be hardest hit by India not abiding by IWT.
Narkagni saheb's brain works on a level I cannot fathom. Something might have been brewing.Main agenda is doing “Business”
But on a serious note, there seems to be a growing murmur (like our champ on the west said, on SM) that Pak citizens are realising that their rear was kicked really hard and that Pak army did squat in return. Add to this the fact that IWT is still in abeyance. Given how an average Pakistani brain works, the “idea of revenge” will most likely crop up.
I could be wrong about this, but given what hellfire posted about the status, something did happen in the background.