Operation Sindoor: India Strikes Terroist Camps Inside Pakitsan

Status
Not open for further replies.
First day loss are expected?How many IAF fighter jets were lost during Iran campaign?
Iran doesn't have Nato specific equipment or chinese spec high end equipment. Iran doesn't get to train with Nato militaries. Iran doesn't have nukes. Stop these dumb comparisons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jk007
JAI HIND!

Regarding the alleged use and damage or loss of a French-designed IAF aircraft during the operation:
Regarding last night's events at the Indo-Pakistani border:

trad:
1. It appears that one or more French aircraft, Rafale and/or Mirage, were shot down. We await further information.
2. If this were to be confirmed, it is not...
1/ ...a disavowal of our aircraft. This shows that the Indians have full confidence in their ability to perform what is called "first entry," meaning being the first aircraft to enter into action while all of the enemy's defense systems...

2/ ...anti-aircraft systems are still fully operational. Tensions had been rising for several days now, and Pakistani units were probably on high alert and may have been reinforced. Furthermore, India indicated that it did not...

3/ ...want to strike military targets to avoid escalating the conflict too much. However, neutralizing defense systems is normally one of the priority objectives. Here, only electronic countermeasures—jammers like the SPECTRA...

4/ ...of the Rafale—could be used to protect the aircraft. In summary, given the density of defenses, their alert level, and the (political) impossibility of neutralizing them, it's hardly surprising that there was damage, even to aircraft...

5/ ...specialized in first entry, like the Rafale. A quick question: I wonder if the database of electromagnetic signatures collected during this operation could be recovered by France. It must contain particularly...

6/ ...interesting information on signals from Chinese defense systems... This must be of interest to more than one person!
Let's now hope that a de-escalation begins after this heated argument.
Nuclear deterrence should play its role in calming things down.

END/
 
Look at the replies to the tweet. Their awaam is angry. I doubt its over
If they do. We will finally get to humiliate pakistani military. They will media control with rafale crash. Don't worry. If they retaliate on orders of their Chinese paymasters things will be a lot more interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jk007
True. But then, given there are many more missiles than manned fighters, wouldn't you be able to make up for these deficiencies with sheer quantity?

No. It's not practical. If all you have is missiles, the enemy will disperse their capabilities in such a way that you will never have enough.

Missiles are fine against large targets, like ships. But against ground infra, missiles are used to degrade enemy capabilities before a bombing campaign is launched. And even that is just to make sure you soften up the enemy for a ground invasion, which then does the true damage.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Arctic Wolf
This was the video I was talking about. here you can see the shoulder patch of the pilot and also the talk about second pilot and it is from Op Sindoor.
But how can u explain the wreck pic of M88 engine?
Yes, I am myself very confused. I still believe my source than anything posted here. My sources have never been wrong and the senior members here know it.
 
Look at the replies to the tweet. Their awaam is angry. I doubt its over

I missed that. :ROFLMAO:

But I think Internet Pakjabis are not important enough. Let's see if they really go through. But I guess it'll be more interesting to see what excuses they actually come up with to avoid an escalation.

What do you think, @arsalan3345?
 
They only found the rear part of one M88 ?
Where is the reste of the engine? Where is the rest of the whole jet ?
I do have a feeling this is similar to the Israeli f-15 flying with one wing. But that's being too delusional and optimistic. Also the engine being seperated intact is also funny. Martin baker did not report any ejections. And we did not lose any pilots too. Maybe too much whitepill.
 
The Iranians don't have an air force. And the Israelis avoided entering Iran's SAM rings.
Iran doesn't have Nato specific equipment or chinese spec high end equipment. Iran doesn't get to train with Nato militaries. Iran doesn't have nukes. Stop these dumb comparisons.

Israel was likely also using F-35s and receiving targeting/intelligence from the US. Needless to say, India cannot replicate either of this.
 
One thing what you all fail to realise is that If PAF can use SAMs against IAF flying flying within its own airspace, what can prevent us to use S-400 against their fighters. The fact is that we have probably shot down 2-3 of their fighters.

They would have operated below horizon or outside the range of the SAM rings.

It's possible the S-400 did not engage across the border due to the operation's RoE and only shot at jets that did cross over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.