Pakistanis saying 70 plus IAF planes attacked Pakistan
"couple of RPVs"???
India has a RPV????? Not drone but RPV?
Where do you get the accurate data of J10c from? In the complex electromagnetic environment of war, can you ensure that every ground radar in India plays its full role? Moreover, all PL-15s have two-way data links and can even rely on the early warning aircraft at the rear to provide relay guidance. Combat distance is not a fundamental influencing factor.Not possible. The j-10C's would get a lock on around 70-90 km. But they will have to be on the borders which seems highly unlikely. The crash direction seems like the plane either crashed while returning to the air force base returning from the north not the west. The j-10's would require to enter Indian AD network if they attacked from the west. Seems unlikely.
Yup. Could be likely. We will get to know soon.Where do you get the accurate data of J10c from? In the complex electromagnetic environment of war, can you ensure that every ground radar in India plays its full role? Moreover, all PL-15s have two-way data links and can even rely on the early warning aircraft at the rear to provide relay guidance. Combat distance is not a fundamental influencing factor.
We have lost a Rafale in Bathinda and a two-seat fighter in Akhnoor.
The two-seat fighter could be a trainer or the MKI. That requires clarification.
Gotta wait for MoD presser.
So it's a Mirage and Rafale, I guess.We have lost a Rafale in Bathinda and a two-seat fighter in Akhnoor.
The two-seat fighter could be a trainer or the MKI. That requires clarification.
Gotta wait for MoD presser.
They will accept it by the evening.There is absolutely no information on Twitter
It is 3 pm now
We could have got information by now
stop this propaganda about your HQ-9BE. they completely failed while our Akash system delivered and shot down your JF-17. Multiple PL-15 missile launches could not hit even a single aircraft and all of them failed.As the wreckage of the M88 engine has been discovered so far, the losses of the Rafale fighter jets can now be basically determined
This time fighting, dassault company was close to tears, the rafale and mirage 2000 were shot down
Kek, so saab has the proprietary data link of PL-15 according to yiu, because they retired your Zdeek awacs saying it is junkWhere do you get the accurate data of J10c from? In the complex electromagnetic environment of war, can you ensure that every ground radar in India plays its full role? Moreover, all PL-15s have two-way data links and can even rely on the early warning aircraft at the rear to provide relay guidance. Combat distance is not a fundamental influencing factor.
he said should be this aircraft. I think it's more like a mig-29 upgSo it's a Mirage and Rafale, I guess.
They will accept it by the evenin

Who knows? The ZDK03 is relatively old, but it's not unusable. We can even be bolder to assume that Pakistan temporarily leased a KJ500 from ChinaKek, so saab has the proprietary data link of PL-15 according to yiu, because they retired your Zdeek awacs saying it is junk
If it wasn't the PL-15 or the HQ-9, how could the crash in Bathinda (most probably a Rafale, in any case, there was a crash in Bathinda) happen? And this isn't counting another likely crash.Multiple PL-15 missile launches could not hit even a single aircraft and all of them failed.
Who knows? The ZDK03 is relatively old, but it's not unusable. We can even be bolder to assume that Pakistan temporarily leased a KJ500 from China

View attachment 42870
View attachment 42871
Don't forget this aircraft. At that time, many people thought it was a JF17BLOCK3, but from the details of the engine, it looks more like a Mirage 2000
The imagery supposedly from Bathinda, Punjab - assuming it isn't AI-generated or doctored, which is possible in this day & age - suggests that the wreckage is indeed a Rafale.
Hasn't been any official statement from IAF so far about any aircraft loss, so until then need to keep all options open.
What's also unknown is the reason for the loss, assuming there was really a loss. It's possible that the crash was due to non-combat reasons (mechanical failure).