Brahmos Supersonic Cruise Missile : News, Updates and Discussions

Why the hurry?

R&D takes time. We finished the development of Brahmos-1 variants by the middle of the previous decade. Then we began the development of advanced versions at the fag end of the previous decade and are now in the construction and even flight testing phase of some of these advanced variants.

You may recall that a lot of things changed after India became part of MTCR in 2016, so some designs went back to the drawing board and some new designs were added in.



Export clearance is a very recent event. So why the hurry?



No. Original plans were 500 for India, 500 for Russia and 1000 for export. India's current orders are more than 500.



Your expectations for Brahmos are based on your own fantasies. No one's gonna meet it.
I believe the Phillipines export order is our first. Even though it's for 2 regiment only.
Next time I post such views, I'd make sure to add a :p to it for better comprehension by you.
Lol. Many noob people even seriously believe such statements trust me 😅
 
Heard about 800km & mini versions. But is it true that we are working with 1500 km version? I didn't heard about it so far.
Also there is no room for 1500 km ranged Nirbhay (if the project become successful ) and a 1500 km ranged ulta expensive Brahmose.

You forget that the Nirbhay will be much cheaper than Brahmos. And it has other uses.
I believe the Phillipines export order is our first. Even though it's for 2 regiment only.

That's fine. I guess the greatest interest will be for the Brahmos-M since its bigger cousin is a bit too expensive for most countries outside small numbers. Also the fact that it will be MTCR restricted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chain Smoker
Flew 150 km, is it a miss reporting on range? Or another failure from Nirbhay
1) Not Nirbhay, but ITCM-03.
2) No misreporting, it flew with the indigenous STFE Manik. So, it was more of a engine + RF-Seeker(I think) validation test.
3) It was a total success. :)
 
Looks like ITCM test is a complete or partial failure. No other reason to not give a press release.

The least performing lab of DRDO, ADE is adamant to keep its reputation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chain Smoker
The ASMP-A have already more than 500 km range, in supersonic ( > Mach 2) ground following mode....
ASN4G will have a range of 1000 KM from what I hear and it will have speed of 6-8 mach. Basically a SCRAMJET propelled weapon.
1628704276540.png

MBDA and France surely has a total mastery of RAMJET propulsion.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Hydra
ASMP is stato ==> it doesn't need to carry oxygene so total mass is divided by two.
Neither does Brahmos.

Both use kerosene in RAM-Jet for propulsion and suck oxygen from atmosphere as oxidizer. ASMP has inlet on its sides, Brahmos has inlet in its nose-cone. So its not that difference. Both also use a rocket cartridge to bring it up to speed to fire up its RAM-Jet.

Why is ASMP is so much more compact and lightweight is a mystery to me. Maybe MBDA knows something that rest of the world does not about making RAM-jets.

For comparison, P-800 Oniks from Russia and YJ-12 from China are both heave weapon. The closest weapon in its weight class is Kh-31 from Russia, but that is just having a range less than 130KM and a warhead capacity of less than 100 KG.
 
Last edited:
The missile was fired just prior to 10 am and remained airborne for 15 minutes, covering a distance of 100 km. As per DRDO sources, while the indigenous engine tested successfully, the delivery platform encountered a technical hitch.

So its failed again, i dont beleive the media reports like we already inducted this missile with forces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chain Smoker
Indranil mentioned somewhere in Twitter.. We have around 20-30 nibhaya frames made as a batch.
Just a speculation I guess. I do respect him,but he behaves like a an indigenous item fan boy most of the time. May be an attempt to boost homegrown equipment reputation or a deliberate attempt to stir confusion among enemies on our capabilities.
Logically no military will induct a complex platform like cruise missile which had encountered more than 60 percentage failure rate during developmental trials.
What I feel is that we should scrap Nirbhay program altogether and we should approach Russians or US for help. Being a member of MTCR technically these countries can sell their long range missiles to India, we have spend hell lot of time on developing this missile without any success.
 
Deployed missiles are using Russian Turbofan engine.
Just 3 successful tests out of 7 before the deployment news came. U still beleive that news about deployment? Also not tested for full range in last successful test too.
FYI the brand new failure of yesterday is due to missile proble asper that link,not on engine. It says missile is having glitches still.
 
FYI the brand new failure of yesterday is due to missile proble asper that link,not on engine. It says missile is having glitches still.
Details are not provided. Many times in integrating new components, neither component in itself are faulty but integration is not correct. Any engineering student knows, integration is the hardest problem there.

1628812142056.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chain Smoker
Details are not provided. Many times in integrating new components, neither component in itself are faulty but integration is not correct. Any engineering student knows, integration is the hardest problem there.

View attachment 20568
User doesn't care about those things,they don't need to.what user is required is credible, reasonably reliable product. Nirbhay & the word reliable didn't go together till today. And there is no any official statement from military on Nirbhay deployment,what we have is some fanboys statements/reporting/tube videos.
 
User doesn't care about those things,they don't need to.what user is required is credible, reasonably reliable product. Nirbhay & the word reliable didn't go together till today. And there is no any official statement from military on Nirbhay deployment,what we have is some fanboys statements/reporting/tube videos.
If you want to be really honest, you don't know what was tested and what was achieved or what failed. There are always "un-named sources" used by media. You don't even know if this was Nirbhay or something totally different. All that was there was some reporting in media. There is no official word of test besides perhaps NOTAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chain Smoker
If you want to be really honest, you don't know what was tested and what was achieved or what failed. There are always "un-named sources" used by media. You don't even know if this was Nirbhay or something totally different. All that was there was some reporting in media. There is no official word of test besides perhaps NOTAM.
The first part is always true for each and every missile we tests,none failed the way Nirbhay did. This itself shows how pathetic is it's development.
I said about induction & deploymen, if I am not wrong military used to accept induction of new platform,like what they did with Astra or Akash.