U.K - News, Updates & Discussions.

Status
Not open for further replies.
British Oppression of Subcontinent >>> Amount of Universe remaining to be explored >>> Nazis

And avoiding the facts won't change anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mayawi
British Oppression of Subcontinent >>> Amount of Universe remaining to be explored >>> Nazis

And avoiding the facts won't change anything.
Yeah right. There's an infinite amount of universe left to explore and Indians are still alive today, and 3 arrows represents 1000 fold, so you're saying that 1000x Infinity is the number of Indians killed (we'll assume all who died were killed for now) and yet you still have 1.3 billion left? And that is a fact? If that is a fact, then explain how the original population of India fit inside the universe.

Ignoring the bit about the universe, you have 6 arrows between British oppression and Nazis, which represents 1,000,000. The Nazi's genocided 6 million and killed tens of millions in warfare. So Britain killed 6 trillion Indians? Current global population, which is the highest it's been is currently 7.7 billion, so another non-fact.

Indian propaganda generated to cover up independent government incompetence >>>>>> Facts... it would seem.

Not for one second saying the British Empire wasn't brutal, but it was the same as any other before it and nothing like the Nazis. The Nazis killed 6 million Jews while being contested in war in that area, Britain had 200 years in India uncontested, so the fact you're even posting proves Britain were not worse than Nazis.
 
Last edited:
Yeah right. There's an infinite amount of universe left to explore and Indians are still alive today, and 3 arrows represents 1000 fold, so you're saying that 1000x Infinity is the number of Indians killed (we'll assume all who died were killed for now) and yet you still have 1.3 billion left? And that is a fact? If that is a fact, then explain how the original population of India fit inside the universe.

Ignoring the bit about the universe, you have 6 arrows between British oppression and Nazis, which represents 1,000,000. The Nazi's genocided 6 million and killed tens of millions in warfare. So Britain killed 6 trillion Indians? Current global population, which is the highest it's been is currently 7.7 billion, so another non-fact.

Indian propaganda generated to cover up independent government incompetence >>>>>> Facts... it would seem.

Not for one second saying the British Empire wasn't brutal, but it was the same as any other before it and nothing like the Nazis. The Nazis killed 6 million Jews while being contested in war in that area, Britain had 200 years in India uncontested, so the fact you're even posting proves Britain were not worse than Nazis.

We had our cities burnt and attacked numerous times, grand gates made out of human skulls amassed by killing the citizens after the war was lost. And yet if the general trends show that people feel the British did more bad. Then there's that. No amount of denying it will change anything.
 
You and _Anonymous_ are just Chinese cock puppets. The British were nowhere near as bad as the Nazis, they were oppressive like all empires before them, like the empires that invaded Britain and like India's empires pre-colonialisation but I'm afraid not every famine counts as genocide. More people died from famine in China during 1750-1947 and more have died of hunger in India since despite the green revolution and modern technology and transport. That's a statistical fact.

As regards racism, show me anyone born pre-20th century who wasn't a racist. Brutality? The much romaticised Roman Colosseum was slaves being forced to fight each other to the death for entertainment.

The difference is that this is now unacceptable in the 21st century, so unless you want to go back to the way things were globally, then using what Britain, or other, did as a talking point is irrelevant. I mean China is incurring onto your territory and you and _Anonymous_ are bleating on about what Britain did over 73 years ago. How is that anything but a cheap Maoist diversionary tactic. Will you still be harping on about what Britain pre-1947 when Chinese troops and marching into Delhi and Mumbai?
Blah blah blah. Don't talk bad about my masters in London: Slave loyal dogs


Nazis didnot have world largest empire . It goes to world largest human killer and most racists of human.

The continents have been wiped out of people having different skin color and replaced by white people by britshits .

Nazi or Brit is like potato patato. You all same people in the end except the Irish dogs which dance when men in London point fingers at them .

I just love how one just justifies the hate by just pointing fingers at others. What next Nazis are not that bad because ISIS is much worse ?

I guess the slaves and lap dogs lack comprehension or empathy it's all their masters should not be pointed.


May be entire world should do to britishits what they did to others after all its not worse Nazis right?
 
Last edited:
British military could be left depleted after £13bn shortfall

Britain’s military will have fewer armoured vehicles, aircraft and lose the use of its only naval hospital ship because of a shortfall of up to £13bn in its 10 year equipment budget, the government spending watchdog warned.

The National Audit Office (NAO) said the inability of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to control its spending was starting to affect Britain’s military capability, and accused it of having a short term focus that risked making the situation worse in the future.

In one case, desperate officials paid Boeing $8.2m (£6.4m) just to delay submitting invoices so that the main spending would take place in future years – and only sought permission from the Treasury after the auditor raised concerns.

Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, accused the department of not making “the necessary strategic decisions” and said that it had tried to plug gaps with a “short-term focus on living within annual budgets”.

The government auditor said the lack of financial discipline was “increasingly affecting the armed forces’ ability to maintain and enhance the UK’s military capability” – and that it was the third year in a row the budget had been breached.

According to the NAO, the MoD is planning to spend £183.6bn in the next decade – £2.9bn over budget. If all risks materialised, the shortfall in the 2019 to 2029 equipment plan would balloon to £13bn.

But NAO insiders argued that the most significant impacts on military capability were due to a failure to prioritise. For example, there is no budget to replace or extend the life of the RFA Argus, a 100-bed naval hospital ship, beyond 2024.

Because of the loss of control, the army has been forced to upgrade fewer tanks and has abandoned various other anti-armour projects, while the Royal Air Force is only able to afford 48 of the 114 F-35 jets it had hoped to buy, the auditor added.

A decision to delay the introduction of the next generation Protector drone will only increase long term costs, the NAO said. The Protector delay would add £187m to the budgets in future years, plus a further £50m to retain the existing generation of Predator drones for longer.

The financial shortfall is even more acute in the first half of the 10-year cycle, the NAO warned, saying the ministry had a £6bn budget shortfall of budget up to 2023-24.

Meg Hillier, the chair-elect of the Commons public accounts committee, said: “For the third successive year, the equipment plan is unaffordable. This cannot carry on. The department is locked into short-term thinking, wasting taxpayer’s money, and has missed two chances to sort things out.”

The detailed rebuke comes two days after Boris Johnson announced a strategic review of the government’s defence and foreign policy, which came with a hint that spending on the armed forces could increase beyond the current 2.1% of GDP, creating the hope that taxpayers’ money could plug the gap.

However, it will run by Downing Street and the Cabinet Office, and one of its key figures will be Dominic Cummings, Johnson’s chief aide, who has been highly critical of the soaring costs of MoD procurement.

Stewart MacDonald, the SNP’s defence spokesman, said the NAO’s verdict amounted to “an abject failure of Tory defence policy” and warned that “the United Kingdom is rapidly becoming the ‘hollow force’ experts have long warned that it would”.

MoD equipment budgets are spent on procuring submarines, warships, aircraft and armoured vehicles. It also includes budgets to service existing equipment, including Typhoon aircraft, and introducing modern technology.

An MoD spokesperson said: “Managing these ambitious, complex programmes can be challenging, but we have already achieved £7.8bn of efficiency savings and last year secured an extra £2.2bn for defence.

“The department is progressing towards managing down the legacy liability that it has inherited over the years.”
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ghobbitses
Army ‘to be cut by 20,000’ if No 10 plan is approved
Royal Marine commandos may vanish as Cummings backs cyber-warfare and shoots forces chief ‘down in flames’

Defence chiefs have drawn up plans to slash the army by a quarter and reduce the Royal Marines to a bit part as part of Boris Johnson’s defence and security review.

The drastic cuts, which would also close airfields and take helicopters out of service, were drawn up in response to Treasury demands that Whitehall departments map out cuts of 5% or more as part of the government’s comprehensive spending review.

In the worst-case scenario:

• Army manpower would fall from 74,000 to 55,000

• The Royal Marines commando brigade would be disbanded, losing its artillery, engineers and landing craft. Royal Navy minesweepers would also face the axe

• The RAF would shut several airbases and shed its fleet of Hercules transport planes ....

There is a charge for the rest of the article.
 
We had our cities burnt and attacked numerous times, grand gates made out of human skulls amassed by killing the citizens after the war was lost. And yet if the general trends show that people feel the British did more bad. Then there's that. No amount of denying it will change anything.
The facts are there. When people talk of the Nazis, they talk of people gassed. When Indians talk about the British, they talk of famines, but more people died of famine in China during the same period and more have died of hunger and malnutrition in India since 1947 than in 200 years of British rule, those are indisputable facts. Wars aren't genocides. That's not to say they're just, just that they are different.
 
Blah blah blah. Don't talk bad about my masters in London: Slave loyal dogs


Nazis didnot have world largest empire . It goes to world largest human killer and most racists of human.

The continents have been wiped out of people having different skin color and replaced by white people by britshits .

Nazi or Brit is like potato patato. You all same people in the end except the Irish dogs which dance when men in London point fingers at them .

I just love how one just justifies the hate by just pointing fingers at others. What next Nazis are not that bad because ISIS is much worse ?

I guess the slaves and lap dogs lack comprehension or empathy it's all their masters should not be pointed.


May be entire world should do to britishits what they did to others after all its not worse Nazis right?
Yeah, imagine if the Nazis weren't defeated and did have the world's largest empire though. Ever seen The Man in The High Castle? And to think your dumbass hero Chandra Bose sided with them.

Continents wiped out? Which continents would those be then?

What I'm saying is that empires didn't start with the UK, India had several empires, not least The Cholas. India had also been invaded by several European countries before Britain even got there. So don't pretend anything started with Britain because it didn't.

All this started because I pointed out China's current genocide of the Uighurs. Strange that. Strange pattern, same protagonists.
 
Last edited:
Army ‘to be cut by 20,000’ if No 10 plan is approved
Royal Marine commandos may vanish as Cummings backs cyber-warfare and shoots forces chief ‘down in flames’

Defence chiefs have drawn up plans to slash the army by a quarter and reduce the Royal Marines to a bit part as part of Boris Johnson’s defence and security review.

The drastic cuts, which would also close airfields and take helicopters out of service, were drawn up in response to Treasury demands that Whitehall departments map out cuts of 5% or more as part of the government’s comprehensive spending review.

In the worst-case scenario:

• Army manpower would fall from 74,000 to 55,000

• The Royal Marines commando brigade would be disbanded, losing its artillery, engineers and landing craft. Royal Navy minesweepers would also face the axe

• The RAF would shut several airbases and shed its fleet of Hercules transport planes ....

There is a charge for the rest of the article.
But as per Paddy here, quitting the EU comes with a saving of 11 billion euros or 11 billion pounds that were being sucked up by the EU. Surely, that amount could be well spent in bolstering up the Royal Army, AF & Navy, isn't it? @BMD
 
Yeah, imagine if the Nazis weren't defeated and did have the world's largest empire though. Ever seen The Man in The High Castle? And to think your dumbass hero Chandra Bose sided with them.

Continents wiped out? Which continents would those be then?

What I'm saying is that empires didn't start with the UK, India had several empires, not least The Cholas. India had also been invaded by several European countries before Britain even got there. So don't pretend anything started with Britain because it didn't.

All this started because I pointed out China's current genocide of the Uighurs. Strange that. Strange pattern, same protagonists.

Netaji lived in house, not castle.

 
But as per Paddy here, quitting the EU comes with a saving of 11 billion euros or 11 billion pounds that were being sucked up by the EU. Surely, that amount could be well spent in bolstering up the Royal Army, AF & Navy, isn't it? @BMD
That may yet be the case all said and done but conservatives tend to spend conservatively. Worst case scenario is the key phrase. E.g. In a worst case scenario, by the time that 10 year budget plays out, Emperor Xi Jinping may have you goose stepping up and down in front of the Taj Mahal.
 
That may yet be the case all said and done but conservatives tend to spend conservatively. Worst case scenario is the key phrase. E.g. In a worst case scenario, by the time that 10 year budget plays out, Emperor Xi Jinping may have you goose stepping up and down in front of the Taj Mahal.
You mean Boris has no qualms with the Iranians pulling off his pants once again & I trust most Brits are fine with being cuckolded by the mullahs of Iran too. Why, that's a pretty candid admission by your standards too, Paddy?! It was totally unexpected.

As far as Xitler goes, frankly I don't think he's as ambitious as what you've attributed to him. He'd be content with taking Ladakh & some more territory in the North East of India that the Chinese have been claiming for years. Whether he achieves it or not is to be seen.

Meanwhile, he's openly challenged the Brits by not only tearing up all agreements on the future of HK but also threatened to indefinitely halt the departure of prospective naturalized citizens of the UK from HK.

I suspect being habituated to cuckoldery, HM's government & it's citizens in the UK must be secretly enjoying such treatment. What else explains their total silence on the matter. UK seems to have become the laughing stock of the world. Putin was prescient when he described the UK as a damp decripit place longing for the world's attention, a few years ago.
 
Last edited:
Army ‘to be cut by 20,000’ if No 10 plan is approved
Royal Marine commandos may vanish as Cummings backs cyber-warfare and shoots forces chief ‘down in flames’

Defence chiefs have drawn up plans to slash the army by a quarter and reduce the Royal Marines to a bit part as part of Boris Johnson’s defence and security review.

The drastic cuts, which would also close airfields and take helicopters out of service, were drawn up in response to Treasury demands that Whitehall departments map out cuts of 5% or more as part of the government’s comprehensive spending review.

In the worst-case scenario:

• Army manpower would fall from 74,000 to 55,000

• The Royal Marines commando brigade would be disbanded, losing its artillery, engineers and landing craft. Royal Navy minesweepers would also face the axe

• The RAF would shut several airbases and shed its fleet of Hercules transport planes ....

There is a charge for the rest of the article.

They will complement it with people from Police. Plus, as you may remember in Dunkirk, ordinary people came with fishing boats to evacuate brits. So this time people from Agricultural sector might complement British Army.
I think you've misunderstood my point. The Man in The High Castle is a TV series that depicts life in a world where the Nazis and Japanese (the guys Bose sided with) won WWII.

ok
 
You mean Boris has no qualms with the Iranians pulling off his pants once again & I trust most Brits are fine with being cuckolded by the mullahs of Iran too. Why, that's a pretty candid admission by your standards too, Paddy?! It was totally unexpected.

As far as Xitler goes, frankly I don't think he's as ambitious as what you've attributed to him. He'd be content with taking Ladakh & some more territory in the North East of India that the Chinese have been claiming for years. Whether he achieves it or not is to be seen.

Meanwhile, he's openly challenged the Brits by not only tearing up all agreements on the future of HK but also threatened to indefinitely halt the departure of prospective naturalized citizens of the UK from HK.

I suspect being habituated to cuckoldery, HM's government & it's citizens in the UK must be secretly enjoying such treatment. What else explains their total silence on the matter. UK seems to have become the laughing stock of the world. Putin was prescient when he described the UK as a damp decripit place longing for the world's attention, a few years ago.
For a start, the tanker the Iranians seized wasn't even British, it was just flying a British flag and had mostly Indians on board.

Yeah, and Taiwan and the SCS, and that's just for now. Hitler was 'content' with a small amount of contested land in Poland at first.

As you are a draughts man and not a chess man, you will never understand.
Agricultural sector might complement British Army.
That would be vulnerable to a predatory attack from _Anonymous_.
 
For a start, the tanker the Iranians seized wasn't even British, it was just flying a British flag and had mostly Indians on board.
Didn't I post something about a fig leaf earlier, Paddy, barely covering up your unmentionables & revealing far too much for comfort. Classic cuckolded explanation.

If the Brits weren't involved, why did HM's government conclude a deal with Iran. Those Indian sailors were well treated & freed after a few months. We have a level of understanding with the Iranians. They know their limits with us & vice versa.

Yeah, and Taiwan and the SCS, and that's just for now. Hitler was 'content' with a small amount of contested land in Poland at first.
Well, there's a thread trending out here right now on China's actions & our response.Perhaps you ought to go thru it's contents. India isn't Vietnam or Philippines nor are the Himalayas the equivalent of the SCS for the Chinese to try stunts like what they've been doing there. I suppose just coz your Government is impotent & your people like being cuckolded, you think everybody around has tomato juice running in their veins. Just like you.

As you are a draughts man and not a chess man, you will never understand.

Better than being fruitcakes , Paddy. Nothing to beat being poof boys like you.
 
Last edited:
Those Indian sailors were well treated & freed after a few months. We have a level of understanding with the Iranians. They know their limits with us & vice versa.
Yeah, you're not important enough for them to care about at all.
 
For a start, the tanker the Iranians seized wasn't even British, it was just flying a British flag and had mostly Indians on board.

Yeah, and Taiwan and the SCS, and that's just for now. Hitler was 'content' with a small amount of contested land in Poland at first.

As you are a draughts man and not a chess man, you will never understand.

That would be vulnerable to a predatory attack from _Anonymous_.

Like India in early 20th century.
For a start, the tanker the Iranians seized wasn't even British, it was just flying a British flag and had mostly Indians on board.

Yeah, and Taiwan and the SCS, and that's just for now. Hitler was 'content' with a small amount of contested land in Poland at first.

As you are a draughts man and not a chess man, you will never understand.

That would be vulnerable to a predatory attack from _Anonymous_.

Don't understand. Anonymous is a predator?
 
Yeah, you're not important enough for them to care about at all.
If being important in your dictionary mean having your ships boarded & detained with you being a P-5, a former super power with a decently sized armada at present too but lacking the balls to take on a decrepit moth eaten has been, then we prefer to be unimportant. What's the use of all the power, Paddy? Have a good one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.