That only works if you can permanently find 2m-high cover in the case of the T-14.
Of course they have!
That only works if you can permanently find 2m-high cover in the case of the T-14.
Of course they have!
Here's what happens when a T-72 is hit with an RPG-29.
An RPG-29 kills any Russian tank from T-55 to T-90M from any aspect.
JFC, I can't believe you're even trying to compare the combat record of Russian tanks to a Challenger 2.
There's been several dozen T-90/T-90Ms lost in Ukraine. And you only said T-type tanks.
BS.The Challenger is still the only 21st century tank that got smoked by an RPG from the front.
To be fair, Challenger 2 didn't face the sort of first-world army Russian tanks faced on a regular basis (USA and UK in the Gulf Wars 1 and 2, Croatian Army in Yugoslavia, and now Ukrainian Army). On the flip side, it is undeniable that they do have design flaws:BS.
1. It was not from the front, it was from below.
2. It was not destroyed, it was driven back to base.
3. It entered service in 1998, not 21st century.
4. Lot's of Russian tanks have been destroyed from all angles by RPGs, including the front.
I mean, the fact is that they can list every Challenger II incident over 25 years of service. 3 in total, 1 friendly fire destruction, and 2 non-destructive incidents involving an RPG-29 from below and a shaped charge IED. None for the Challenger I. The crew survived in both incidents. Does anyone have the time to list every incident for any T-XX tank? There are multiple incidents every day... or even every hour sometimes these days.
Russian tanks suffer more losses per hour than British tanks have suffered in half a century and you're still arguing with me?
The black knight is you.
Well that's the problem, the main flaw with Russian tanks is (most of) the people who use them.
www.edrmagazine.eu
warviews.wordpress.com