Ukraine - Russia Flare Up

Innominate

Well-Known member
Jun 23, 2021
1,387
885
California
Just imagine, nato can drop 30 bombs on russia they can still find some place in their vast country to rebuild new cities.
UK or England on the other hand is just an island , 3 or 4 bombs and the whole country will be a grand toast. All that british can do is jump into that freezing ocean or run away to US if they survive.
Lol. With what manpower are these Russians going to built new cities? Vast majority of Russian population lives near Europe it won't take a lot of nukes to take them out and leave a residue.
 

BMD

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
12,757
2,574
forget it dude, NATO neither has the numbers in nuke game on their side nor the territorial depth to fight back. If US is removed then EU cuts even more sorry state, just a fraction of what russia has. (My offer of relocation to afghanistan still holds good, just do a somersault and make up with taliban. )

Just imagine, nato can drop 30 bombs on russia they can still find some place in their vast country to rebuild new cities.
UK or England on the other hand is just an island , 3 or 4 bombs and the whole country will be a grand toast. All that british can do is jump into that freezing ocean or run away to US if they survive.


NATO very much has the numbers in both regards.

If all the cities are melted who will be left to build in the wastelands of Siberia, and with what?

Number of people per square km.

1663923061884.png


All the British can do is fire >8 warheads for every city Russia has. Yeah, that's all. Sure the UK gets destroyed but there's not going to be much left of Russia either. There's no way to win a nuclear war, it's suicide, that is what Putin is threatening when he mentions nukes, he's threatening to kill himself and Russia.
 

BMD

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
12,757
2,574
smart alec, we are not the ones fighting a proxy war with russia.

what humiliation ,bird brain? you need to stop confusing your feelings with that of the country.
why cant the birdy even make out the difference between war & an incident?
Well you've made it clear that you hate the west and want it destroyed, so you are backing Russia as your proxy.
 

A Person

Senior member
Dec 1, 2017
1,091
1,079
A Place
forget it dude, NATO neither has the numbers in nuke game on their side nor the territorial depth to fight back.
SIPRI data:

Looking at the "deployed warheads" statistics, meaning the ones that are actually read to use, we get 2144 nukes for NATO, and 1588 for Russia.

As for territorial depth, NATO represents 24.6 million km², Russia represents 17.1 million km². NATO is bigger, surprise.

But Russia's territorial depth is mostly empty land. If you nuke Russian cities, what's left of Russia is not Russia anymore, it becomes terra nullius. NATO is 950 million people (38.6 p/km²), Russia is 150 million people (8.8 p/km²).
Just imagine, nato can drop 30 bombs on russia they can still find some place in their vast country to rebuild new cities.
And you know who is gonna rebuild new cities in that territory? It will not be Russians, since there won't be any Russian anymore. It will be the Chinese.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMD

Rajput Lion

Member
Sep 23, 2022
10
8
India
You missed the sarcasm in it and took it verbatim.
Pranam sir🙏🙏

Big fan and follower of yours for quite some time. Must say that your analysis of this war is spot on. Also my eyes got tears reading about your family sacrifices.

What most modern Indians don't understand is this long Western game of civilization domination. After Russia, it's China then it is going to be our term.

People have forgotten our rich past. Also pray for Mother Russia to thrash these Eurotards for good.

Keep your observations going. Reading it is big pleasure👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: vstol Jockey

Ankit Kumar

Team StratFront
Nov 30, 2017
4,462
4,226
Bangalore

BMD

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
12,757
2,574
There will come a point where the nation's supplying the equipment will start feeling a severe pinch.

These items are not exactly cheap. And they will need to replace them. And do it while facing energy issues.

USA has too big a reserve, they won't feel it. Its the others who need to worry.
I've pointed out several times that the cost of all support supplied to Ukraine is >1% of GDP, less than 0.5% so far in fact. We can do this forever.

Many of the richer people are choosing this opportunity to get Tesla Powerwalls and ASHP/GSHPs installed, or buy EVs. This naturally reduces the demand for gas and oil. Equally fracking is on the rise again.
 
Last edited:

BMD

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
12,757
2,574
Bad,very bad. You said you joined as a commissioned officer in IN aviation wing, didn't expect such behaviour from man like you.
Bob him on ignore. Nobody who says they want a nuclear war is worth listening to. There is literally nothing to want about a nuclear war.

Is it 'okay' if you're not involved? Again, let's analyse this. Look at where the Russian cities are:

1663941600348.png


Now look at where the wheat belt is:

1663941641248.png


And in the EU.

1663941744375.png


So the consequences of nuclear war between the 'white racishists' and Russia is hundreds of millions of Africans and Indians and others starving to death (billions in total) and the subsequent collapse of government and law and order. What is there to want about that?

This is just one of the many incalculable consequences.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hydra

Rajput Lion

Member
Sep 23, 2022
10
8
India
Bob him on ignore. Nobody who says they want a nuclear war is worth listening to. There is literally nothing to want about a nuclear war.

Is it 'okay' if you're not involved? Again, let's analyse this. Look at where the Russian cities are:

View attachment 24601

Now look at where the wheat belt is:

View attachment 24602

And in the EU.

View attachment 24603

So the consequences of nuclear war between the 'white racishists' and Russia is hundreds of millions of Africans and Indians and others starving to death (billions in total) and the subsequent collapse of government and law and order. What is there to want about that?

This is just one of the many incalculable consequences.
It ain't @vstol Jockey who is pushing for a nuclear war. The western nations like UK and USA are literally pushing for it by stretching the patience of Russia .

Don't play with fire if you don't want to get burnt😎
 

Ankit Kumar

Team StratFront
Nov 30, 2017
4,462
4,226
Bangalore

I've pointed out several times that the cost of all support supplied to Ukraine is >1% of GDP, less than 0.5% so far in fact. We can do this forever.

Many of the richer people are choosing this opportunity to get Tesla Powerwalls and ASHP/GSHPs installed, or buy EVs. This naturally reduces the demand for gas and oil. Equally fracking is on the rise again.
Sustaining the current level of support over next say 4-5 months will be difficult.

Power , fuel and supply line issues will be sorted, no doubt. But the militaries of respective countries will be taking a hit. How big a hit, that remains to be seen.
We need a European MIC effort strong enough to deter Russia without US support. This is a critical requirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion

jetray

Senior member
Mar 15, 2018
2,250
1,225
India
Bob him on ignore. Nobody who says they want a nuclear war is worth listening to. There is literally nothing to want about a nuclear war.

Is it 'okay' if you're not involved? Again, let's analyse this. Look at where the Russian cities are:

View attachment 24601

Now look at where the wheat belt is:

View attachment 24602

And in the EU.

View attachment 24603

So the consequences of nuclear war between the 'white racishists' and Russia is hundreds of millions of Africans and Indians and others starving to death (billions in total) and the subsequent collapse of government and law and order. What is there to want about that?

This is just one of the many incalculable consequences.

yeah its a melodramatic macabre scene out of bond movie, every one should die so that west can save the world. We can lend some crappy bollywood heroines to shed some tears to make it look real. (fake western crocodile tear wont cut )

Finally west should be happy that their bond movies are turning out to be real. Villian is out to destroy the whole world , while the british with their stunted dogs which cannot even walk on uneven side walk are out to save it.
 

jetray

Senior member
Mar 15, 2018
2,250
1,225
India
Well you've made it clear that you hate the west and want it destroyed, so you are backing Russia as your proxy.
West dug its own hole.
There is a long line to piss on west we are not the first. You will find more ppl in europe itself like ireland or serbia to shit on west.
 

jetray

Senior member
Mar 15, 2018
2,250
1,225
India
SIPRI data:

Looking at the "deployed warheads" statistics, meaning the ones that are actually read to use, we get 2144 nukes for NATO, and 1588 for Russia.

As for territorial depth, NATO represents 24.6 million km², Russia represents 17.1 million km². NATO is bigger, surprise.

But Russia's territorial depth is mostly empty land. If you nuke Russian cities, what's left of Russia is not Russia anymore, it becomes terra nullius. NATO is 950 million people (38.6 p/km²), Russia is 150 million people (8.8 p/km²).

And you know who is gonna rebuild new cities in that territory? It will not be Russians, since there won't be any Russian anymore. It will be the Chinese.
europe is more densely populated than russia, which means more causalities. I have stated the same point that russia has nothing much to lose dropping bombs on their empty lands/ underdeveloped is pretty useless, its just like afghanistan with little or no infra. West has more to lose, make your choice.

If russia loses and china gains, you still got another problem.
 

jetray

Senior member
Mar 15, 2018
2,250
1,225
India
NATO very much has the numbers in both regards.

If all the cities are melted who will be left to build in the wastelands of Siberia, and with what?

Number of people per square km.

View attachment 24600

All the British can do is fire >8 warheads for every city Russia has. Yeah, that's all. Sure the UK gets destroyed but there's not going to be much left of Russia either. There's no way to win a nuclear war, it's suicide, that is what Putin is threatening when he mentions nukes, he's threatening to kill himself and Russia.
only the densely populated areas will be destroyed will the sparsely populated will survive.
Nuclear war is not abt winning but imposing maximum damage on the enemy. As such biggest losers will be europe.
 

A Person

Senior member
Dec 1, 2017
1,091
1,079
A Place
I have stated the same point that russia has nothing much to lose dropping bombs on their empty lands/ underdeveloped is pretty useless
But why the heck would we bomb Russia's empty land? I told you: bomb Moscow, and you destroy Russia. Russia is actually Muscovy. As soon as you leave the greater Moscow region, you're not in Russia anymore. You're in one of a thousand colonized territory of a non-Russian ethnicity. So we've only got a dozen or so of Russian cities to destroy and then Russia is gone forever.
If russia loses and china gains, you still got another problem.
Nope! We won't have a problem cause in your scenario, we'll be dead! And problems are for living people only. The dead don't care. 💀

That way, we won't be able to help you when China invades India. And by your own logic:
europe is more densely populated than russia, which means more causalities.
India has more to lose! So congratulations, by being a Russia shill, you are actively supporting the annihilation of India by China!