Non-renewable energy in India: News, Updates & Discussions.

suryakiran

Team StratFront
Dec 1, 2017
1,054
1,363
Bangalore
Summary
India’s thermal power sector has seen a lot of initiatives by the government in the recent past to address structural issues plaguing it. These include implementation of the UDAY scheme to strengthen the weakest link of distribution, allocation of new coal linkages under SHAKTI to address fuel supply constraints, and auction of medium-term PPAs to address offtake issues.

Then there’s the ongoing resolution process for stressed thermal plants, which, if successfully implemented, will decide the fate of over Rs 1 lakh crore of debt.

Depending on the residual debt after resolution, the cost of power generation for these capacities can reduce significantly. This can change the tide for stressed capacities given the healthy power demand growth of 6-7% and slowdown in new capacity addition.

To show how the initiatives have fared, and to answer relevant questions, CRISIL is conducting a webinar on the thermal power sector, where its experts will talk on the following topics:
Power demand-supply dynamics and this translating to new PPAs

  • Sufficiency of coal to meet the increasing power demand
  • The road ahead for capacities at risk
  • What next for discoms after three years of UDAY
The webinar will include a presentation and a panel discussion, followed by a Q&A session.

@Hellfire @Milspec @Shajida Khan @Nilgiri @Arvind


Register on this page
 
Coal imports swell 6.7% to 172 million tonne in April-December
Coal imports in India saw a surge of 6.7 percent to 171.81 million tonne (MT) in the April-December period of the ongoing financial year, according to a report.

This comes at a time when the government is mulling relaxing the timeline for achieving the 1 billion tonne coal production target for Coal India.

Coal imports stood at 161 MT in the April-December period of 2017-18, as per the report by mjunction services.

mjunction -- a joint venture between Tata Steel and SAIL -- is a B2B e-commerce company that also publishes research reports on coal and steel verticals.

Import of coal in December however declined 8.09 percent to 17.25 MT from 18.77 MT in the year-ago month.

Commenting on this trend, mjunction Managing Director and CEO Vinaya Varma said: "The demand for imported coal waned, to some extent, due to higher despatch to power plants by domestic miners."

With the coal stock situation improving in the power sector and production increasing in the fourth quarter, import demand is likely to remain subdued as compared to previous months, he added.

Of the total imports during December last year, non-coking coal was at 12.52 MT as compared to 13.01 MT imported in November 2018.

Coking coal imports were at 3.72 MT in December 2018, down from 3.75 MT imported a month ago.

"India's coal....imports during December 2018 through 31 major and non-major ports are estimated to have declined 3.88 percent over November 2018," according to a provisional compilation by mjunction based on monitoring of vessels' positions and data received from shipping companies.

Coal Minister Piyush Goyal had earlier urged state-run Coal India to pledge self-sufficiency in production to eliminate import of the dry fuel.

The government has set a target of 1 billion tonne of coal production by 2019-20 for the mining major, but is considering relaxing the timeline.
Coal imports swell 6.7% to 172 million tonne in April-December
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hellfire
I know this is not renewable power, but still it is an important development. We don't have a separate thread for thermal power so lets keep this here for now.

FGD system installation underway for nearly 60GW capacity of NTPC

By PTI
Last Updated: Dec 16, 2021, 05:50 PM IST
1639810093148.png

Total FGD commissioned capacity of NTPC so far is 1,340 MW, Power Minister R K Singh said in a written reply to the Lok Sabha. Photo: NTPC thermal power plant at Kudgi.

Synopsis
Various agencies which are setting up FGD systems are GE Power India, BHEL, ISGEC Heavy Engineering, Larsen & Toubro, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems India, PES Engineers, TATA Projects, Engineering Projects India, KC Cotrell and Melco India.


Flue Gas De-sulphurisation (FGD) system to control pollution is installed for 1340 MW coal-fired thermal power capacity of NTPC while the work in underway at 38 plants with around 60GW capacity, Parliament was informed on Thursday. Total FGD commissioned capacity of NTPC so far is 1,340 MW, Power Minister R K Singh said in a written reply to the Lok Sabha.

He said FGD system installation is underway at 38 plants (127 units) totaling 60GW of thermal power general capacity of NTPC across the country.

Various agencies which are setting up FGD systems are GE Power India, BHEL, ISGEC Heavy Engineering, Larsen & Toubro, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems India, PES Engineers, TATA Projects, Engineering Projects India, KC Cotrell and Melco India.

The minister told the House that the contracts have been awarded by NTPC to the contractors who have emerged as the lowest (L1) bidder project wise through competitive bidding after extensive reverse auction process and are within NTPC's cost estimate range.

The tendering in lot system had no impact on the price evaluation process as price bid evaluation has been carried out separately for each project, he said.

NTPC adopted the lot system to minimize the tendering process time with a view to awarding and meeting the timelines and accordingly, all units of NTPC were divided into various categories for implementation of FGD systems and new units were tendered first followed by old units, he stated.

Further, he said the projects which could not be awarded mainly due to higher cost with respect to cost estimates were retendered in subsequent lots.

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), vide notification dated December 7, 2015, issued the emission standards for Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) for thermal power plants (TPPs).

Accordingly, all TPPs are required to control the emission levels of SO2 within the prescribed standards. NTPC power plants were also covered under the said notification, he stated.

FGD system installation underway for nearly 60GW capacity of NTPC
 
Coal demand to peak in India by 2030, will back up renewables: NITI report

IEA study supports trend, says India will lead demand growth for the fuel in the world

By Shreya Jai | New Delhi Last Updated at December 21, 2021 01:14 IST
1640238340355.png

Photo: Bloomberg

Coal will remain India’s mainstay energy source and the country will shape global demand this decade, two reports have said a month after the government declared ambitious targets for being a Net Zero economy in 50 years and 500 GW of renewable energy capacity addition.

NITI Aayog, the central government’s think tank, said in a report coal demand will be in the range of 1192-1325 million tonne by 2030, led by usage from the electricity sector. The International Energy Agency (IEA), in its annual coal report said, stronger economic growth and increasing electrification will drive demand growth of 4 per cent per year.

Coal-based utility electricity generation capacity in India is likely “to peak at about 250 GW” by the end of this decade or immediately thereafter, said the NITI report. It added that coal-based utility electricity generation in India will slow down, and is likely to peak a few years later, i.e. later 2040.

IEA said iron and steel production use coal and there are not many technologies to replace the fuel immediately. “India’s growing appetite for coal is set to add 130 million tonnes (Mt) to coal demand between 2021 and 2024. Continued expansion of India’s economy is expected during 2022-2024, with annual average GDP growth of 7.4 per cent, fueled at least partially by coal. We forecast coal consumption to increase at an average annual rate of 3.9 per cent, to reach 1185 Mt in 2024,” IEA’s Coal 2021 report said.

It said India’s push to domestic coal mining through both Coal India and auction of coal blocks to private companies, coal usage in India will increase as it plateaus in other parts of the world, including China. It also said India is set to overtake China as the world’s largest metallurgical coal importer.

The NITI report said while coal-based thermal power generation will grow in absolute terms for the next decade, its share in the total power generation mix of the country will decline to a 50-55 per cent (from current 72 per cent) in the next 10 years. This, it said would be due to the changing capacity mix with increasing share of renewable energy.

On November 1, at Glasgow global climate summit COP26, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced India will be a Net Zero economy by 2070 and will have 500 GW of renewable energy by 2040. This paper reported had reported, this announcement is unlikely to put pressure on coal.

Senior government officials told Business Standard, Net Zero decision actually provides certainty to investors in coal – both state owned Coal India Limited (CIL) and private captive and commercial coal miners.

“The 1 billion tonne coal production target of CIL will get logged into the economy in this decade. For another 20-30 years the future of coal is secure in India. The mines awarded now have a clear business case to run for their lifetime,” said an official requesting anonymity.

Even IEA noted in its report, the pledges to reach net zero emissions made by many countries, including China and India, should have very strong implications for coal – “but these are not yet visible in our near-term forecast, reflecting the major gap between ambitions and action.”

NITI Aayog cautioned against the target versus achievement of renewable energy in India. “India is unlikely to achieve its target of 100 GW of solar and 60 GW of wind capacity by 2022. Given the current “surplus capacity” in the system, distribution utilities are reluctant to sign fresh power purchase agreements, given their already distressed financial situation. Investments are likely to be constrained following the COVD-19 pandemic. For all these reasons, the development of the renewables sector needs to be tracked carefully.”

“They should also be very cautious of adding new coal capacity beyond 2030 as it risks locking in resources. India must enhance investments in the deployment of clean coal technologies throughout the coal value chain. Government power utilities must show the way by investing in the deployment of advanced clean coal technologies,” it said.

Screenshot (850).png

Source: IEA Coal 2021 report (Coal - Infogram)

Coal demand to peak in India by 2030, will back up renewables: NITI report
 
Plan on table to halt new coal-fired power plants

By Sarita C Singh & Urmi Goswami
ET Bureau, Last Updated: Dec 22, 2021, 06:17 AM IST
1640240027958.png

NTPC Thermal Power Plant. (Representative Image)
Synopsis
At the UN climate change summit COP26 in Glasgow last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced India's aim to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070 and also pledged to attain 500 GW of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030.


India is considering a proposal to halt new coal-based power units as the country works out a plan to meet commitments made at COP26.

An expert committee tasked by the Union power ministry to update the National Electricity Policy (NEP) has recommended that no new coal-based capacity be considered, said people with knowledge of the matter. Replacement of old coal-based units should only be taken up when it is "convincingly established that it is not viable to meet the projected demand from alternate non-fossil fuel sources", according to its suggestions, said one of the people aware of the details.

At the UN climate change summit COP26 in Glasgow last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced India's aim to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070 and also pledged to attain 500 GW of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030.

Power Ministry's Earlier Stance

The expert committee's recommendation is a marked shift from the power ministry's earlier stance that the country may add more capacity through fossil-fuel sources as they continue to be a cheap source of electricity.

A senior government official said the report submitted by the expert committee in the last week of October is under deliberation. Once the draft policy is prepared, it will be circulated by the ministry among stakeholders for comments, he said.

1640239764334.png


The committee, headed by Gireesh Pradhan, former chairman of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, framed its recommendations after consulting all stakeholders, including states. The National Electricity Policy lays down the guidelines for the optimal utilisation of resources such as coal, natural gas, nuclear substances, hydro and renewable sources of energy and was last tweaked in 2005. The Electricity Act provides for its periodic revision.

"With growing penetration of renewable energy, about 60 GW of thermal capacity under construction and average thermal PLF (plant load factor) around 55%, we certainly do not need any more thermal," said Association of Power Producers director general Ashok Khurana. "As power demand increases, our first priority should be to get stranded coal and gas projects on stream."

The committee has suggested replacement of coal-based capacity should only be based on technology that's flexible in ramp-up and ramp-down and has higher efficiency rates, said the people cited above.

De-carbonisation of the electricity system is pitched as one of the priorities of the policy through retirement of inefficient plants and retrofitting existing coal-fired projects to enable flexible ramp-up and ramp-down of generation.

Hydro and gas-based projects are considered to be flexible in generation, while coal-fired plants take several hours to reach the required output and cannot quickly be scaled back if demand drops.

The committee has also recommended that inefficient generating units with a heat rate of over 2700 Kcal per kWh must be retired before March 31, 2023.

Experts said the days of thermal energy in India seem to be numbered given the country's surplus installed base, coupled with the push toward non-fossil energy and emerging energy storage technologies that will make renewable energy available round the clock.

In September, seven UN member countries launched a no-new-coal-energy compact at the UN High-Level Dialogue on Energy in their bid to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

Plan on table to halt new coal-fired power plants
 
Plan on table to halt new coal-fired power plants

By Sarita C Singh & Urmi Goswami
ET Bureau, Last Updated: Dec 22, 2021, 06:17 AM IST
View attachment 22206
NTPC Thermal Power Plant. (Representative Image)
Synopsis
At the UN climate change summit COP26 in Glasgow last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced India's aim to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070 and also pledged to attain 500 GW of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030.


India is considering a proposal to halt new coal-based power units as the country works out a plan to meet commitments made at COP26.

An expert committee tasked by the Union power ministry to update the National Electricity Policy (NEP) has recommended that no new coal-based capacity be considered, said people with knowledge of the matter. Replacement of old coal-based units should only be taken up when it is "convincingly established that it is not viable to meet the projected demand from alternate non-fossil fuel sources", according to its suggestions, said one of the people aware of the details.

At the UN climate change summit COP26 in Glasgow last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced India's aim to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070 and also pledged to attain 500 GW of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030.

Power Ministry's Earlier Stance

The expert committee's recommendation is a marked shift from the power ministry's earlier stance that the country may add more capacity through fossil-fuel sources as they continue to be a cheap source of electricity.

A senior government official said the report submitted by the expert committee in the last week of October is under deliberation. Once the draft policy is prepared, it will be circulated by the ministry among stakeholders for comments, he said.

View attachment 22205

The committee, headed by Gireesh Pradhan, former chairman of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, framed its recommendations after consulting all stakeholders, including states. The National Electricity Policy lays down the guidelines for the optimal utilisation of resources such as coal, natural gas, nuclear substances, hydro and renewable sources of energy and was last tweaked in 2005. The Electricity Act provides for its periodic revision.

"With growing penetration of renewable energy, about 60 GW of thermal capacity under construction and average thermal PLF (plant load factor) around 55%, we certainly do not need any more thermal," said Association of Power Producers director general Ashok Khurana. "As power demand increases, our first priority should be to get stranded coal and gas projects on stream."

The committee has suggested replacement of coal-based capacity should only be based on technology that's flexible in ramp-up and ramp-down and has higher efficiency rates, said the people cited above.

De-carbonisation of the electricity system is pitched as one of the priorities of the policy through retirement of inefficient plants and retrofitting existing coal-fired projects to enable flexible ramp-up and ramp-down of generation.

Hydro and gas-based projects are considered to be flexible in generation, while coal-fired plants take several hours to reach the required output and cannot quickly be scaled back if demand drops.

The committee has also recommended that inefficient generating units with a heat rate of over 2700 Kcal per kWh must be retired before March 31, 2023.

Experts said the days of thermal energy in India seem to be numbered given the country's surplus installed base, coupled with the push toward non-fossil energy and emerging energy storage technologies that will make renewable energy available round the clock.

In September, seven UN member countries launched a no-new-coal-energy compact at the UN High-Level Dialogue on Energy in their bid to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

Plan on table to halt new coal-fired power plants
Any information about hydrogen based power plants? Is it commercially feasible to run them in GW capacities?
 
You need to build 1,000 nuclear power plants, as this is likely to take some time, you need to start now.
There's a 3 stage N power generation plan framed way back in the 1950's detailing the steps to be undertaken for the next 100 yrs. Things are moving in the direction of that master plan.

@Gautam has written a series of informative articles on them if you're interested in perusing them.
 
Any information about hydrogen based power plants? Is it commercially feasible to run them in GW capacities?
At current prices extraction & transportation of green hydrogen is a far more expensive process than the amount of money that can be made by selling electricity generated by combustion of Hydrogen. So I don't see how thermal plants running on Hydrogen is going to work. Hydrogen has uses in powering many sectors: Industrial, Residential, Commercial, Transportation etc.

But electricity at your home from Hydrogen combustion isn't happening anytime soon.

Right now there are 2 viable processes of producing green Hydrogen:
1. Electrolysers
2. High Temperature Nuclear Reactors

We are working on reactors like the CHTR & the IHTR, but it is a future technology. Electrolysers are available right now but need large scale expansion. That's where companies like Reliance, GAIL, NTPC, TATA, Ohmium etc. come in. All of them are investing in building, acquiring & scaling up electrolysers. But electrolyser technology is not exactly a monolith, there are many types of electrolysers:

1. Alkaline Electrolysers (AE): They were first developed in India by BARC for some nuclear research work. ISRO acquired the tech from them & set up their own Hydrogen production capability. The hydrogen ISRO produced were mostly meant to power their cryogenic hydrolox engines.
2. Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM): Recently developed & tested by CSIR-CERI. This is a spin-off of the R&D work done on the DRDO's PAFC AIP system. CSIR-CERI was involved with the NMRL in the development of the polymer membrane for the AIP. The CSIR is trying to commercialize the technology.
3. Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOE), Electrochemical-Thermally Activated Chemical (E-TAC) & and Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM): Proprietary technologies developed by foreign companies. Don't know a lot about it.

AE is easily available but requires a lot of electricity. Comparatively PEM is much more energy efficient. The other processes mentioned above are even better then PEM but they use some rare earth minerals, thus scaling them up is a problem. The companies that are trying to get into Hydrogen production in India are largely looking to setup PEM electrolysers. But a lot of the companies want to import the tech rather than using the tech developed by CSIR-CERI. As such the lab is trying to convince these companies to adopt their tech. The govt. might announce a PLI for green hydrogen production too & they might link it to using CSIR-CERI developed PEM. Let's see how this goes.

Production is one thing, transportation is an additional headache. Hydrogen is the lightest element & it is a gas at room temp. Hydrogen gas has a density so low that it permeates out of most pipes. You need pipes made of very high density alloys that are ultra expensive to transport hydrogen gas safely & efficiently. The other way is to transport cryogenically cooled liquid hydrogen, which is no less problematic.

So what do you do? Find a easily transportable chemical that can act as a hydrogen carrier. The carrier chemical will preferable be a fuel itself. Hydrogen in gaseous form will be dissolved as solute into this gaseous or liquid carrier that will be the solvent. The solution will be used directly by end users as fuel.

Much to the great dismay of many environmental activists such a hydrogen carrier chemical is likely going to be a hydrocarbon. So which hydrocarbons are in consideration? 3 hydrocarbons each with its own advantages & disadvantages. Briefly we have the following:

1. Natural Gas(Methane):

Advantages:
i. Being a gas it can dissolve the highest volume of Hydrogen. Therefore it is the most efficient carrier of hydrogen.
ii. Natural gas has high calorific value which would be increased by the presence of Hydrogen.
iii. The technology needed to generate grid scale electricity from natural gas already exists at very competitive prices. The same technology is adaptable for hydrogen spiked natural gas.
iv. There is political will behind natural gas. Modi wants to increase the share of natural gas in our energy grid from the current 6% to 15% by 2030.

Disadvantages:
i. India doesn't have a lot of natural gas. 43% of our current gas consumption comes from domestic sources. If we rely on gas too much in the next few decades this is going to become another drain on our foreign reserves like oil is now.
ii. India's current pipeline infrastructure is inadequate. We have built just ~15,000 km of pipelines in the last 27 years prior to 2014. Since 2014 we have been building an additional 16,000+ km.
iii. We don't have a lot of gas fired power plants. So if we are going to use natural gas as the hydrogen carrier we will also have to set up new gas fired plants.

Future scope:
Our reserves of conventional gas is limited. But we have a lot of Methane hydrates. Extracting methane from hydrates is not something that has been commercially established anywhere yet. Many of our research establishments & companies are working on gas extraction technologies. We have also signed agreements with US, Japan & Canada for co-operation in development of the tech needed. All 3 of these nations have their own gas hydrates reserves, so they have a skin in the game. Some of these countries claim that commercial production of gas from hydrates can be done with in the next 5 years.

Recently we've made some breakthroughs of our own:

How to sequester carbon dioxide and produce natural gas

We have nearly ~2000 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Methane hydrates. If we can tap even a small share of this it would greatly change the energy & geo-political scenario for us.

2. Ethanol

Advantages:

i. Of the 3 hydrocarbons mentioned here Ethanol is the 2nd most efficient Hydrogen carrier. Liquid fuel are easier to transport.
ii. Can be easily adopted into the transportation sector. Spark ignition engines can readily adopt Ethanol. Burn cleaner than petrol.
iii. Produced from food grains, sugar, agro waste etc. No long term import dependency concern. Can reduce problems of stubble burning.
iv. Can reduce our crude oil import bill. Has acquired govt. support in form of the Ethanol Blending Program (EBP). EBP seeks to achieve 20% ethanol blending from the current 8.5% by 2025.

Disadvantages:
i. Lower calorific value than petrol & natural gas. To produce as much energy as 1 liter of petrol you would need to burn 1.5 liters of Ethanol. Not feasible to use in oil fired electricity plants.
ii. Can have an adverse effect on food security. Requires a meticulously designed incentive scheme to ensure optimal production of Ethanol that doesn't cause an artificial scarcity of food items. We all know how good New Delhi is with incentive schemes.
iii. The EBP will cause short term import dependency on USA & Brazil.

Future scope:
The only way we will achieve 20% Ethanol blending by 2025 is if we import ethanol. Domestic ethanol production plants aren't coming up fast enough. Consumption is shooting through the roof. A program designed to reduce import dependence on crude oil will end up causing a temporary import dependence on ethanol. Brilliant. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

3. Methanol

Advantages:

i. Can be produced from our domestic coal. We have a lot of coal & it is pretty cheap. No problems of import dependency or price.
ii. Cleanest liquid hydrocarbon. Easy to transport.
iii. Can be used to make Di-Methyl Ether (DME) that can wholly replace Diesel. Diesel engines need minor tweaks to their compression ratios to use DME. DME can thus be used in road, rail & marine transportation.

Disadvantages:
i. Globally available tech for producing Methanol from Coal doesn't work on Indian coal due to its high ash content. We have to develop our own tech.
ii. It the poorest carrier of hydrogen. Also has the lowest calorific value. You would have to burn 1.9 liters of Methanol to produce energy equivalent to 1 liter of Petrol. Not feasible to be used for producing electricity.

Future scope:
Recently BHEL had a breakthrough with Methanol production. In Sep 2021 BHEL announced that their R&D centre in Hyderabad set up a coal gasification plant that is now producing 0.25 ton per day (TPD) of Methanol from Indian high ash coal using a 1.2 TPD Fluidized bed gasifier. SO they used 1.2 ton Indian coal to produce 0.25 ton Methanol.

India's first Indigenously Designed High Ash Coal Gasification Based Methanol Production Plant at BHEL R&D Centre, Hyderabad

https://dst.gov.in/indias-first-pil...hanol-can-accelerate-countrys-journey-towards

India has 340+ billion metric tons of coal, at our current consumption levels we consume less than 1/350th of our reserves every year. The low conversion ratio of Indian coal to Methanol is not a problem. The fact that we can produce high purity Methanol from Indian coal is a big deal. Still BHEL needs to establish the scalability of their tech.

Some good reads on Methanol in India:

vikaspedia Domains

https://www.thehindubusinessline.co...t-methanol-for-clean-fuel/article34183663.ece

https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/i...ould-be-a-cheaper-fuel-for-india-7540761.html

It is hard to say with certainty where we are headed in the energy scheme in say 30 years from now. But is seems clear that none of these carriers alone can cater to all of our needs. Thus we need to keep developing all of them. The good thing is that the govt. is investing in all 3 potential options.

Anyway I have rambled on for long enough. Let me know if I made any mistakes, I am half asleep right now. I am going to bed. Good night.
 
At current prices extraction & transportation of green hydrogen is a far more expensive process than the amount of money that can be made by selling electricity generated by combustion of Hydrogen. So I don't see how thermal plants running on Hydrogen is going to work. Hydrogen has uses in powering many sectors: Industrial, Residential, Commercial, Transportation etc.

But electricity at your home from Hydrogen combustion isn't happening anytime soon.

Right now there are 2 viable processes of producing green Hydrogen:
1. Electrolysers
2. High Temperature Nuclear Reactors

We are working on reactors like the CHTR & the IHTR, but it is a future technology. Electrolysers are available right now but need large scale expansion. That's where companies like Reliance, GAIL, NTPC, TATA, Ohmium etc. come in. All of them are investing in building, acquiring & scaling up electrolysers. But electrolyser technology is not exactly a monolith, there are many types of electrolysers:

1. Alkaline Electrolysers (AE): They were first developed in India by BARC for some nuclear research work. ISRO acquired the tech from them & set up their own Hydrogen production capability. The hydrogen ISRO produced were mostly meant to power their cryogenic hydrolox engines.
2. Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM): Recently developed & tested by CSIR-CERI. This is a spin-off of the R&D work done on the DRDO's PAFC AIP system. CSIR-CERI was involved with the NMRL in the development of the polymer membrane for the AIP. The CSIR is trying to commercialize the technology.
3. Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOE), Electrochemical-Thermally Activated Chemical (E-TAC) & and Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM): Proprietary technologies developed by foreign companies. Don't know a lot about it.

AE is easily available but requires a lot of electricity. Comparatively PEM is much more energy efficient. The other processes mentioned above are even better then PEM but they use some rare earth minerals, thus scaling them up is a problem. The companies that are trying to get into Hydrogen production in India are largely looking to setup PEM electrolysers. But a lot of the companies want to import the tech rather than using the tech developed by CSIR-CERI. As such the lab is trying to convince these companies to adopt their tech. The govt. might announce a PLI for green hydrogen production too & they might link it to using CSIR-CERI developed PEM. Let's see how this goes.

Production is one thing, transportation is an additional headache. Hydrogen is the lightest element & it is a gas at room temp. Hydrogen gas has a density so low that it permeates out of most pipes. You need pipes made of very high density alloys that are ultra expensive to transport hydrogen gas safely & efficiently. The other way is to transport cryogenically cooled liquid hydrogen, which is no less problematic.

So what do you do? Find a easily transportable chemical that can act as a hydrogen carrier. The carrier chemical will preferable be a fuel itself. Hydrogen in gaseous form will be dissolved as solute into this gaseous or liquid carrier that will be the solvent. The solution will be used directly by end users as fuel.

Much to the great dismay of many environmental activists such a hydrogen carrier chemical is likely going to be a hydrocarbon. So which hydrocarbons are in consideration? 3 hydrocarbons each with its own advantages & disadvantages. Briefly we have the following:

1. Natural Gas(Methane):

Advantages:
i. Being a gas it can dissolve the highest volume of Hydrogen. Therefore it is the most efficient carrier of hydrogen.
ii. Natural gas has high calorific value which would be increased by the presence of Hydrogen.
iii. The technology needed to generate grid scale electricity from natural gas already exists at very competitive prices. The same technology is adaptable for hydrogen spiked natural gas.
iv. There is political will behind natural gas. Modi wants to increase the share of natural gas in our energy grid from the current 6% to 15% by 2030.

Disadvantages:
i. India doesn't have a lot of natural gas. 43% of our current gas consumption comes from domestic sources. If we rely on gas too much in the next few decades this is going to become another drain on our foreign reserves like oil is now.
ii. India's current pipeline infrastructure is inadequate. We have built just ~15,000 km of pipelines in the last 27 years prior to 2014. Since 2014 we have been building an additional 16,000+ km.
iii. We don't have a lot of gas fired power plants. So if we are going to use natural gas as the hydrogen carrier we will also have to set up new gas fired plants.

Future scope:
Our reserves of conventional gas is limited. But we have a lot of Methane hydrates. Extracting methane from hydrates is not something that has been commercially established anywhere yet. Many of our research establishments & companies are working on gas extraction technologies. We have also signed agreements with US, Japan & Canada for co-operation in development of the tech needed. All 3 of these nations have their own gas hydrates reserves, so they have a skin in the game. Some of these countries claim that commercial production of gas from hydrates can be done with in the next 5 years.

Recently we've made some breakthroughs of our own:

How to sequester carbon dioxide and produce natural gas

We have nearly ~2000 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Methane hydrates. If we can tap even a small share of this it would greatly change the energy & geo-political scenario for us.

2. Ethanol

Advantages:

i. Of the 3 hydrocarbons mentioned here Ethanol is the 2nd most efficient Hydrogen carrier. Liquid fuel are easier to transport.
ii. Can be easily adopted into the transportation sector. Spark ignition engines can readily adopt Ethanol. Burn cleaner than petrol.
iii. Produced from food grains, sugar, agro waste etc. No long term import dependency concern. Can reduce problems of stubble burning.
iv. Can reduce our crude oil import bill. Has acquired govt. support in form of the Ethanol Blending Program (EBP). EBP seeks to achieve 20% ethanol blending from the current 8.5% by 2025.

Disadvantages:
i. Lower calorific value than petrol & natural gas. To produce as much energy as 1 liter of petrol you would need to burn 1.5 liters of Ethanol. Not feasible to use in oil fired electricity plants.
ii. Can have an adverse effect on food security. Requires a meticulously designed incentive scheme to ensure optimal production of Ethanol that doesn't cause an artificial scarcity of food items. We all know how good New Delhi is with incentive schemes.
iii. The EBP will cause short term import dependency on USA & Brazil.

Future scope:
The only way we will achieve 20% Ethanol blending by 2025 is if we import ethanol. Domestic ethanol production plants aren't coming up fast enough. Consumption is shooting through the roof. A program designed to reduce import dependence on crude oil will end up causing a temporary import dependence on ethanol. Brilliant. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

3. Methanol

Advantages:

i. Can be produced from our domestic coal. We have a lot of coal & it is pretty cheap. No problems of import dependency or price.
ii. Cleanest liquid hydrocarbon. Easy to transport.
iii. Can be used to make Di-Methyl Ether (DME) that can wholly replace Diesel. Diesel engines need minor tweaks to their compression ratios to use DME. DME can thus be used in road, rail & marine transportation.

Disadvantages:
i. Globally available tech for producing Methanol from Coal doesn't work on Indian coal due to its high ash content. We have to develop our own tech.
ii. It the poorest carrier of hydrogen. Also has the lowest calorific value. You would have to burn 1.9 liters of Methanol to produce energy equivalent to 1 liter of Petrol. Not feasible to be used for producing electricity.

Future scope:
Recently BHEL had a breakthrough with Methanol production. In Sep 2021 BHEL announced that their R&D centre in Hyderabad set up a coal gasification plant that is now producing 0.25 ton per day (TPD) of Methanol from Indian high ash coal using a 1.2 TPD Fluidized bed gasifier. SO they used 1.2 ton Indian coal to produce 0.25 ton Methanol.

India's first Indigenously Designed High Ash Coal Gasification Based Methanol Production Plant at BHEL R&D Centre, Hyderabad

https://dst.gov.in/indias-first-pil...hanol-can-accelerate-countrys-journey-towards

India has 340+ billion metric tons of coal, at our current consumption levels we consume less than 1/350th of our reserves every year. The low conversion ratio of Indian coal to Methanol is not a problem. The fact that we can produce high purity Methanol from Indian coal is a big deal. Still BHEL needs to establish the scalability of their tech.

Some good reads on Methanol in India:

vikaspedia Domains

Has methanol finally got its due?

Here’s Why Methanol Could Be A Cheaper Fuel For India

It is hard to say with certainty where we are headed in the energy scheme in say 30 years from now. But is seems clear that none of these carriers alone can cater to all of our needs. Thus we need to keep developing all of them. The good thing is that the govt. is investing in all 3 potential options.

Anyway I have rambled on for long enough. Let me know if I made any mistakes, I am half asleep right now. I am going to bed. Good night.
Absolutely wonderful post . A real gem !! You ought to take it to Twitter. I actually asked & expected a small summation . You packed in quite a bit of information. Not that I'm complaining.

Wanted to pen this last night but was caught up in other activities.

One of the few reasons I returned. Else most of the good members here or in any other forum have switched to Twitter .

I guess 2022 will see the rest follow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gautam and SammyBoi
Greater Noida Authority to supply refused derived fuel to NTPC

To help NTPC demonstrate an environment-friendly technology for producing green power and chemicals

Our Bureau
New Delhi | Updated on December 29, 2021
1640932448687.png


India largest power generator, NTPC has inked a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) for supplying for refused derived fuel, or the combustible fraction of municipal solid waste.

According to the MoU, GNIDA will be supplying 20 tonnes per day (TPD) of refused derived fuel (RFD) to NTPC for a period of ten years. The initiative will help NTPC demonstrate an environment-friendly technology for producing green power and chemicals from RDF and is planned under the theme of ‘NETRA Green Campus’ where the campus will have 24x7 green power from solar PV, battery storage, H2 and RDF.

The Refused Derived Fuel (RDF) shall be fed into Oxy-Steam Gasification plant to produce syngas which after cleaning will be fired in the gas engine to generate 400 KW of green power. In the second stage of the project, the syngas shall be upgraded to produce liquid fuel/methanol/ hydrogen (H2).

NETRA (NTPC Energy Technology Research Alliance) is the research and development (R&D) wing of the State-owned power generator that focuses on developing and demonstrating technologies for carbon capture, green hydrogen and methanol production using CO2 from its power plant.

NTPC Group present installed capacity is 67,907.5 MW (including 13,675 MW through JVs/ Subsidiaries) comprising of 49 NTPC stations (23 coal-based stations, 7 gas-based stations, 1hydro station, 18 Renewable projects) and 26 joint venture stations (9 coal-based, 4 gas-based, 8 hydro, 1 small hydro,2 wind and 2 solar PV). About 13,600 MW of its project is at under-construction stages.

Greater Noida Authority to supply refused derived fuel to NTPC
 
Another critical area to keep an eye on in the non-renewable energy space would be the co-firing of biomass with coal in our coal plants. Given the number of coal fired plants we have this could have far reaching consequences. Let's take look at why biomass co-firing is a good idea. There are many good articles available on this topic. I have take 3 recent articles that I think summarizes it really well:

1. The need/benefits of co-firing Biomass in India:

Can biomass co-firing offer a viable solution to coal shortage and stubble burning ?

It is a win-win solution for the farmers and the environment

By Jasleen Bhatti
Published: Thursday 21 October 2021
1640935304142.png


The Government of India (GoI) has made it mandatory for thermal power plants in three categories to use a 5 per cent blend of biomass pellets and coal. The policy will come into effect in October 2022, with a requirement to increase the blend to 7 per cent within two years for two categories of plants. The co-firing policy will be in effect for 25 years or till the useful life of the thermal power plant, whichever is earlier.

India's economy is on the path to recovery since the second wave of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The first half of October saw a 4.9 per cent increase in electricity consumption compared to September. However, coal supply fell short of demand by 1.4 per cent. The government reported a shortage in coal supply despite abundant reserves.

Several factors contributed to this, including an increase in electricity demand due to the recovery of the economy (and the festival season), rains in coal-mining areas and insufficient stocking of coal before the monsoon season. Moreover, global energy prices are on the rise. The factors combined resulted in outages in several states.

India has shown rapid growth in installed renewable energy capacity. The country still relies heavily on coal-based power generation to meet most of its electricity demand.

The power sector contributes nearly 50 per cent of the sector-wise carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Coal and coal-based power is the single-largest contributor of CO2 emissions in India, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

CO2 emissions based on sector and fuel usage in India
1640935498834.png

Source: International Energy Agency, 2020

Efforts to ensure 24x7 power supply to all grid-connected households will mean a significant increase in coal-powered electricity and CO2 emissions. Coal imports will also rise, which will increase energy security concerns.

Gross electricity generated from utilities and net availability of electricity (in GWh)
1640935541150.png

Source: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI)

In India, the government is committed to ensuring that all grid-connected households have 24x7 access to reliable power. The result will be a significant increase in coal-fired power generation and CO2 emissions. Coal imports will also rise, which will increase energy security concerns.

Year-wise availability, production, and imports of coal in million tonnes (MT)
1640935595006.png

Source: Office of the Coal Controller, Ministry of Coal

India declared its Nationally Determined Contribution goals for 2030 in the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius (preferably 1.5°C) from pre-industrial levels. The country ratified the same in October 2016.

It includes lowering the emissions intensity of its gross domestic product by 33-35 per cent compared to 2005 levels by 2030 and also increasing cumulative electricity generation from renewable energy sources to 40 per cent by 2030. India must reduce coal-based GHG emissions rapidly to meet the NDC goals. Coal plants with higher emissions will be shut down and replaced with cleaner ones soon.

How prudent is it for India to construct new coal power plants at this time, given that countries around the world have stopped investing in coal-fired power plants ?

Biomass co-firing has been shown to reduce coal power plant carbon footprint in Europe, the US and the United Kingdom, according to a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Biomass pellets made from agricultural waste have equivalent calorific value to that of Indian coal, based on estimates from the Central Electricity Authority (CEA).

In the past decade, crop residue burning has caused terrible pollution in northwestern India, especially in Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. Around 85 to 100 million tons of crop residue have been burnt in recent years, despite various government policies aimed at reducing crop burning.

Co-firing biomass pellets with coal in India is a promising strategy for reducing GHG emissions from coal-based power plants. In places where agro-residue burning is prevalent, this can result in a reduction of coal dependence and a sharp decline in pollution levels.

Farm fires have already begun in Punjab and Haryana.

Stubble burning in Punjab and Haryana as of October 11, 2021
1640935643985.png

The red dots indicate the number of fires in the area. Each dot corresponds to one of the several areas where the fire is located.
Source: NASA Satellite Image

In contrast to last year, there are no apparent differences in the number of fires. In October, rice is harvested and rabi crops must be planted within a few days after removing crop stubble.

In earlier days, only a small portion of the stubble was burned. However, in recent times, labour shortages, increased use of harvester technology (which leaves a longer stubble) and lack of market linkages to maximise residue use have all contributed to a significant rise in crop residue burning.

In India rice, wheat and sugarcane alone contribute nearly 80 per cent of the agro-residue.

Crop-wise agro-residue generation in India
1640935692053.png

A third of the gross residue is considered theoretical surplus. For bagasse, the gross residue is itself considered as theoretical surplus. Source: CSE estimate using 2016–17 crop yields of five major crops

India is largely agrarian, with around half its population engaged in farming. Uttar Pradesh produces nearly a quarter (130 million tonnes) of India's total agro-residue. Punjab, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Bihar are the other top agro-residue producers.

Nearly 550-650 million tonnes of gross agro residue is generated in India. Of this, 160–190 million tonnes is available for bio-energy, according to the Union Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) website.

Crop residue burning contributes significantly to air pollution in our cities, according to the CSE analysis. Burning 100 million tonnes of crop residue in the field emits approximately 140 million tonnes of CO2, 5.8 million tonnes of CO and 1.1 million tonnes of particulate matter (PM).

Crop residue burning releases sooty black carbon, which is a major contributor to climate change. CO2 and other emissions under various agro-residue use scenarios have been analysed.

The potential for utilising agro-residue varies from zero to almost 100 per cent. NOx and SO2 emissions decrease with an increase in blending percentage.

Impact on CO2 and other emissions under various agro-residue utilisation scenarios
1640935723018.png

For this Calculation, agro-residue burning is not considered carbon neutral. NOx emissions reduction
is dependent on the firing technology and properties of the biomass used.
Source: Centre for Science and Environment, 2020

A stand-alone solution to these two problems (stubble burning and coal generating power) will burn a hole in the exchequer’s pocket, and even afterward, returns on investment will not be guaranteed. What if we were to see the broader picture and make one problem the solution to another problem ?

This resource cannot be ignored, with around 50 per cent of the population engaged in agriculture. Agro-residue co-firing in older power stations can solve the government's plethora of problems. An effective method to address pollution and mitigate climate change is to identify older units that are operating efficiently and to promote their co-firing with biomass.

Pellet and briquette manufacturers’ factory-gate prices for agro residue range between Rs 2-2.5 per kilogram (Rs 2,000-2,500 per tonne). Prices vary significantly with the type of crop residue.

This cost is mainly made up of labour costs associated with collecting agro-residue from the fields, loading and unloading it as well as transporting it. After deducting the labour and transport costs, farmers can earn between Rs 500-Rs 1,500 per tonne of crop residue.

In addition, pellet manufacturing, storage, handling and transportation create jobs in rural areas.

Can biomass co-firing offer a viable solution to coal shortage and stubble burning?


2. The domestic supply chain perspective for Biomass in India:

Meeting green targets through biomass

Biomass can be an effective means to raise the green footprint but there are some issues that need to be resolved

By Richa Mishra | Updated on December 11, 2021
1640936043529.png

Green thrust Biomass co-firing in thermal plants is mandatory. Image: NTPC's new Patratu Super Thermal Power Project in Ramgarh district, Jharkhand. (Representational Image)

Green energy is not only about solar and wind, but about biomass too. Biomass today is an important fuel in many countries, especially for cooking and heating in developing countries and over the years its use as fuel for transportation and electricity generation has been increasing.

India’s focus on this segment of green energy also comes from the statements made by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In his statement at the recently held COP26 summit, the Prime Minister said: “In the midst of this global brainstorming on climate change, on behalf of India, I would like to present five nectar elements, Panchamrit, to deal with this challenge.

“First — India will reach its non-fossil energy capacity to 500 GW by 2030.
“Second — India will meet 50 per cent of its energy requirements from renewable energy by 2030.
“Third — India will reduce the total projected carbon emissions by one billion tonne from now onwards till 2030.
“Fourth — By 2030, India will reduce the carbon intensity of its economy by less than 45 per cent.
“And fifth — by the year 2070, India will achieve the target of Net Zero. These panchamrits will be an unprecedented contribution of India to climate action.”

Though the government has been taking steps to make it an important part of India’s energy basket, the latest being a move to mandatorily push for biomass co-firing in the thermal power plants as a means to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel, concerns remain on how successful this effort will be.

It will be successful only if it finds full acceptance among the stakeholders, particularly power generation companies and distributors. Since it is a policy and not a regulation, making it mandatory may not mean much. Also there are questions over its cost and quantity and quality. Procurement as well as right price and quality may prove to be the most critical aspect.

Also while State power generation companies will be able to manage the increase in cost due to biomass pellet co-firing by claiming Under Change in Law provisions, clarity on regulatory mechanism of pass through for open capacity was also needed, industry observers feel.

Supply chain needed

Therefore, there is a need to establish proper supply chain and ensure adequacy of stock to achieve the 5 per cent requirement, which increases to seven per cent from the second year. There is the issue of additional cash flow burden on independent power producers (IPPs) due to this transition, especially as the IPPs are already in stress due to distribution utilities defaulting on payments.

Recently, the Union Power Ministry reviewed the status of biomass utilisation in thermal power plants. The revised Policy on Biomass utilisation for power generation through co-firing in coal based power plants was issued on October 8. This policy was revised as the earlier policy was an advisory issued by Ministry without any mandatory use of biomass.

The Power Ministry on November 17, 2017, had issued policy on biomass utilisation for power generation through co-firing in coal based power plants. In the earlier policy, it had advised coal based thermal power plants, except those having ball and tube mill, of power generation utilities, to endeavour to use 5-10 per cent blend of biomass pellets made, primarily, of agro residue along with coal after assessing the technical feasibility and safety aspect.

In order to further support the energy transition in the country and to achieve the target of cleaner energy sources, a modified policy was issued on October 8, 2021. This policy is expected to provide the necessary direction in achieving the goals.

The salient points of the “Revised Policy for Biomass Utilization for Power Generation through Co-firing in Coal based Power Plants” were:

(i) Mandating all thermal power plants to use 5 per cent blend of biomass pellets made, primarily, of agro residue along with coal with effect from one year of the date of issue of this guideline. This will increase to 7 per cent (except for those having Ball & Tube mill the use of biomass remain 5 per cent) with effect from two years after the date of issue of this order and thereafter.
(ii) Minimum contract period for procurement of biomass pellets by generating utilities shall be for seven years so as to avoid delay in awarding contracts by generating companies every year and also to build up long-term supply chain.
(iii) Provisions related to tariff determination and scheduling:
(a) For projects set up under Section 62 of the Electricity Act 2003, the increase in cost due to co-firing of biomass pellets shall be pass through in Energy Charge Rate (ECR).​
(b) For projects set up under Section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003, the increase in ECR due to biomass co-firing can be claimed under Change in Law provisions.​
(c) Such additional impact on ECR shall not be considered in deciding Merit Order Despatch (MOD) of the power plant.​
(d) Obligated Entities such as Discoms can meet their Renewable Purchase Obligations (RPO) by buying such generation of co-firing.​

Combatting stubble burning

In fact, the Power Ministry has already set-up the National Mission on use of Biomass in coal based thermal power plants, to address the issue of air pollution due to farm stubble burning and to reduce carbon footprints of thermal power generation. The Mission is taking steps to encourage and support the biomass co-firing in the thermal power plants.

According to the government, as a result of these efforts, around 1,400 tonne of biomass has been fired in October and 53,000 tonne of biomass was utilised as green fuel in power plants so far. The Ministry’s National Mission is expected to curtail air pollution in North West India as well as prevent loss of fertility of agriculture land and provide a sustainable income source for farmers, suppliers and biomass fuel manufacturers.

The current availability of biomass in India is estimated at 750 million tonne annually. The estimated surplus biomass availability is at about 230 million tonne annually covering agricultural residues.

Despite these efforts concerns remain as electricity is de-licensed and the Union Power Ministry without backing of any Act may not have the necessary wherewithal to enforce mandatory use of biomass. According to industry observers, only the Central Pollution Control Board or the Bureau of Energy Efficiency have power/supporting acts which could enable them to put a mandatory condition.

The buzz is that the Power Ministry is planning to a mandatory condition in Energy Conservation Act amendment. Also the Ministry will need to issue a model agreement for procurement of biomass and create a procurement portal. Till all the issues are resolved, the fear is that this effort also may end up being just another initiative of the government.

Meeting green targets through biomass


3. Indian market's potential for global exporters of Biomass:

Viewpoint: India's 2022 biomass use to rise

By Ajay Modi and Deborah Sun
26/12/2021 | 11:47 pm
1640936695491.png

Various types of biomass pellets prepared from various types of agricultural wastes. Representational Image.

Indian biomass demand is expected to increase in 2022 amid a policy for utilities to burn more wood pellets and reduce coal consumption, though the increase is unlikely to have any impact on the seaborne market.

India is aiming to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels in its journey to reach net-zero emissions by 2070. It has accordingly mandated utilities to co-fire biomass with coal. This will raise demand for biomass in the coming years but ample domestic supplies mean that consumers are unlikely to turn to the seaborne market, at least in the foreseeable future.

Indian utilities must co-fire at least 5% biomass pellets within the next one year, according to a recent policy by the country's federal power ministry, aimed at reducing coal consumption and curbing pollution. Co-firing should be raised to 7% from October 2023 for two categories of power plants, namely those with a bowl mill or with a ball and race mill.

The policy for co-firing will be valid for 25 years or until the useful life of a power plant, whichever is earlier, the ministry said. The biomass pellets must be primarily made up of agricultural residue and the policy encourages local sourcing.

State-controlled utility NTPC's Dadri was the first Indian power plant to co-fire biomass with coal after trials that used 10% biomass in the overall fuel mix. Dadri provides power for the national capital region (NCR), which includes Delhi and its surrounding districts, and has a coal-fired generation capacity of 1,820 MW and gas-fired capacity of 817 MW.

NTPC has further placed an order for 930,000 tonnes of biomass pellets that will lift its co-firing in 2022 and beyond. The largest Indian utility is also executing a tender to procure another 2 million tonnes of biomass, which will enable the firm to co-fire 5 million tonne per year of pellets at its 17 power plants.

Outside the power sector, there are other industries looking to consume biomass to meet their individual goals on emissions. Indian cement makers are aiming to turn their operations carbon neutral well before the country's target of 2070.

Key cement maker Dalmia Bharat has set a target to be carbon negative by 2040, and for a complete replacement of fossil fuels with biomass and alternative energy sources by 2035. India's largest cement maker UltraTech aims to cut emissions by 25pc by 2030 and produce carbon-neutral products by 2050. The company aims to meet 100% of its electricity requirement through renewable sources by 2050.

UltraTech in October signed an agreement with a domestic biomass aggregator to partly replace coal and petroleum coke in its cement kilns. The aggregator, Punjab Renewable Energy Systems (PRESPL) also subsequently signed an agreement with JK Cement to help the firm expand use of biomass and alternative fuels towards replacing fossil fuels.

FMCG and pharmaceutical companies are also eyeing biomass as a replacement fuel. Hindustan Unilever, the Indian subsidiary of FMGC major Unilever, has eliminated coal usage across its operations, replacing it with green alternatives such as biomass and biodiesel as a part of its broader plans to achieve zero emissions in operations by 2030, the company said recently. All its coal-fired boilers have been modified to use biomass and other renewable fuels.

Ample domestic supplies

India is estimated to be using less than 5 million tonne per year of biomass, although potential availability is much higher at 500 million tonne per year, Rohit Dev, chief operating officer at PRESPL told Argus. "We have a mid-term window of opportunity to export biomass pellets until local consumption takes off in a big way," said Dev. At the same time, India could import wood chips from the US and Canada to serve coastal consumers and bridge the gap between domestic supply and demand to scale up biomass use even faster, he added.

PepsiCo India, the Indian subsidiary of the American beverage firm, is using 100pc biomass in its boilers, said Dev. Significant demand for biomass is coming from such industrial boilers. Besides this, state-controlled refiner IOC is setting up biomass-based compressed bio-gas plants to produce transportation fuels, and is expected to support demand in 2022.

Two issues need to be addressed to support small-scale units that want to get into biomass briquettes or pellets, said another market participant. "You need to develop storage infrastructure and facilitate the granting of hassle-free bank financing for biomass projects," he added.

Asian traders of wood pellets and palm kernel shells (PKS) outside of India remain highly skeptical of seaborne demand growth under the new mandate. Traders have previously received enquiries from Indian buyers before the announcement of the new mandate, but discussions ended without any deals being concluded as seaborne biomass prices did not make economic sense at that point.

But even with the new mandate pushing utilities toward biomass, the majority of wood pellet and PKS traders are not optimistic about the growth of seaborne biomass demand in India. The country usually relies on domestic material and only buys when seaborne prices are relatively low. Moreover, the focus on domestic sourcing is providing utilities with little incentive to seek seaborne cargoes.

Viewpoint: India's 2022 biomass use to rise


4. The current market condition of Biomass in India:

The Ministry of Power (MoP) has decided in May 2021 to set up a National Mission on Biomass Use in Coal-fired Thermal Power Plants. They plan to take the co-firing blend ratio of biomass in our thermal power plants from the current ~5% to 10% over the next 5 years. More details about the program here:

Ministry of Power to Set Up National Mission on Biomass Use in Coal-Fired Thermal Plants

With the launch of this program NTPC, India's largest electric company, has started ordering huge quantities of biomass pellets.

NTPC placed an order for 865,000 tonnes of biomass pellets, for which supply is already in progress. Further, NTPC has placed an additional order of 65,000 tonnes in October 2021. Another tranche of procurement by NTPC for 2,500,000 tonnes is in progress, for which the vendors are invited to submit the offer by November 1. In November NTPC ordered an additional 930,000 tonnes.

The states of Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh are procuring 1,301,000 tonnes of biomass pellets for co-firing in their state owned power plants.

Source: NTPC places order for 9.3 lakh tonne biomass pellets - ET EnergyWorld

At this rate it won't take us 5 years to reach 10% blend ratio.
 

Since you evinced an interest in non carbon energy resources ( a bit of a misnomer here tbh ) , I thought there's no better introduction to this subject in India & possibly the world than to see India's richest man & the most powerful group's foray into this terrain.

Points to note : you may want to ignore the teleprompter style pre scripted interview at least early on & if 35 min seems a stretch apart from the accent , pls make use of subtitles & 1.5x speed features on YT.

@Ginvincible
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginvincible

Since you evinced an interest in non carbon energy resources ( a bit of a misnomer here tbh ) , I thought there's no better introduction to this subject in India & possibly the world than to see India's richest man & the most powerful group's foray into this terrain.

Points to note : you may want to ignore the teleprompter style pre scripted interview at least early on & if 35 min seems a stretch apart from the accent , pls make use of subtitles & 1.5x speed features on YT.

@Ginvincible
Yes, I have been keeping on eye on what Ambani and Adani are doing with renewables, especially with solar and hydrogen. They both want to be the leading renewable power companies in the world. I fully expect competition between the both of them will usher in another new age of super low price solar cells and will likely make India one of the leading producers of clean hydrogen. Watch the price of polysilicates and electrolyzers come crashing down by the end of the decade if they actually pull through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Anonymous_
Yes, I have been keeping on eye on what Ambani and Adani are doing with renewables, especially with solar and hydrogen. They both want to be the leading renewable power companies in the world. I fully expect competition between the both of them will usher in another new age of super low price solar cells and will likely make India one of the leading producers of clean hydrogen. Watch the price of polysilicates and electrolyzers come crashing down by the end of the decade if they actually pull through.
What's your take on Reliance backing Na Ion battery instead of traditional Li Ion battery for the transportation sector. Lots of people are of the opinion he's betting against physics & chemistry yet he's gone and bought out a British based unicorn pioneer in this field & Ambani's rarely known for making a false move .
 
What's your take on Reliance backing Na Ion battery instead of traditional Li Ion battery for the transportation sector. Lots of people are of the opinion he's betting against physics & chemistry yet he's gone and bought out a British based unicorn pioneer in this field & Ambani's rarely known for making a false move .
I think for larger vehicles or vehicles that will have more range, lithium is the way to go. Sodium ion could be feasible for smaller, cheaper vehicles with more limited range. I could see it open up the low budget EV market, but then again a better lithium recycling/extraction process could negate any cost advantage sodium has. The issue is just that sodium doesn't have the energy density, I think sodium is fine for stationary grids or like home power storage. All of this is moot if solid state technology makes an entry, I know Toyota has a big focus on making hybrids and solid state EVs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Anonymous_
I think for larger vehicles or vehicles that will have more range, lithium is the way to go. Sodium ion could be feasible for smaller, cheaper vehicles with more limited range. I could see it open up the low budget EV market, but then again a better lithium recycling/extraction process could negate any cost advantage sodium has. The issue is just that sodium doesn't have the energy density, I think sodium is fine for stationary grids or like home power storage. All of this is moot if solid state technology makes an entry, I know Toyota has a big focus on making hybrids and solid state EVs.
If Na Batteries are built to last say 5 hours or 30-40 kms or whichever is lesser , they could subscribe to an energy solutions provider who can provide them with charged batteries from a refilling station much like a gas station for a monthly plan like a subscriber does a phone plan with a service provider.

Ofc this involves setting up of a massive infrastructure of battery mfg , charging stations / refilling stations across the land . Reliance has the wherewithal to do it except he must commercialize the product ASAP & sign up 4 wheel & 2 wheel manufacturers before they standardize their battery on Li ion .

As a sop he can offer the OEMs a royalty for a fixed period of time . As it is with the advent of EVs service stations as we know it will see vastly reduced revenues & consequently so would OEMs as far as sales of spares go except batteries & the occasional accident cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginvincible