Multi-Role Carrier Borne Fighter For The Indian Navy - Updates & Discussions

What should we select?


  • Total voters
    35

Lolwa

Senior member
Feb 6, 2020
1,553
1,004
Delhi
Indeed this is true, but you can't tell the French this. They don't like it. I was just banned from airdefense for posting this in reply to their claim of SC with tanks and weapons to M1.4'
"Of course, you can't quote a Dassault statement that says that. Myths start from many places. A pilot in a Fox article, that's all I've seen. You realize that no other aircraft can do this. I would even say that even the F-22 with its external tanks and armaments cannot do M1.4. In straight and level flight, an important point to add.

Indeed, I am in awe of this powerful Rafale. Only God knows why the UAE wanted a more powerful engine in the Rafale, because they didn't want to lose the specs they had with their F-16," a French general said."
The superhornet is limited to mach 1.6 would love to see where you got the 1.8M numbers for the superhornet
 

Lolwa

Senior member
Feb 6, 2020
1,553
1,004
Delhi
SH are more capable in performance over the "vanilla" F-18 and that "vanilla" with two drop tanks was able out turn a clean Rafale
They are superior in terms of electronics that is it really.
Racist much? You of all people shouldn't say Malaysians "aren't really known to be good at anything" when IAF is best known for crashing jets
It's funny coming from an American considering you guys are crashing brand new f-35's all over the place while for the IAF it's dated Soviet machines that are way past their shelf life. As for RMAF they get bullied by Tiny Singapore .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and Amal

Innominate

Well-Known member
Jun 23, 2021
1,070
701
California
The superhornet is limited to mach 1.6 would love to see where you got the 1.8M numbers for the superhornet

General Characteristics: Max takeoff weight 66,000 lb (29,937 kg) Field landing weight 50,600 lb (22,951 kg) Max catapult payload Max bringback payload 34,000 lb (15,422 kg) E: 9,900 lb (4,491 kg) F: 9,000 lb (4,082 kg) Speed Combat ceiling Design load factor Mach 1.8+ 50,000+ ft (15,240+ m) 7.6g

 
  • Informative
Reactions: RISING SUN

Innominate

Well-Known member
Jun 23, 2021
1,070
701
California
They are superior in terms of electronics that is it really.

And performance you dope. I know you hate to be wrong but you're wrong a lot.
It's funny coming from an American considering you guys are crashing brand new f-35's all over the place while for the IAF it's dated Soviet machines that are way past their shelf life. As for RMAF they get bullied by Tiny Singapore .

Crashing F-35's all over the place? Really?

Get this through your head IAF, not USAF or any other air force, is known and is stereotyped as having a crashing problem.
 

Lolwa

Senior member
Feb 6, 2020
1,553
1,004
Delhi
And performance you dope. I know you hate to be wrong but you're wrong a
What performance. The superhornet flies slower turns slower than the hornet. What exactly does the superhornet offer over the hornet apart from avionics and meme stealth.
And performance you dope. I know you hate to be wrong but you're wrong a lot.


Crashing F-35's all over the place? Really?

Get this through your head IAF, not USAF or any other air force, is known and is stereotyped as having a crashing problem.
Is this some new american cope to deflect from the fact that you guys end up crashing brand new planes while the IAF has done a far better job flying far older and far more unreliable stuff
Compare this to IAF which has flown mig 21's mig 23's and mig 27's. I would say the IAF has performed far better than the USAF considering the flying hours of the average IAF pilot.
 

Innominate

Well-Known member
Jun 23, 2021
1,070
701
California
What performance. The superhornet flies slower turns slower than the hornet. What exactly does the superhornet offer over the hornet apart from avionics and meme stealth.

You're just making yourself look dumb which I know isn't hard for you. I posted a Boeing and other sources of the F-18E's mach 1.8 speed but you choose to bury your head up your nanu nanu.
Is this some new american cope to deflect from the fact that you guys end up crashing brand new planes while the IAF has done a far better job flying far older and far more unreliable stuff
Compare this to IAF which has flown mig 21's mig 23's and mig 27's. I would say the IAF has performed far better than the USAF considering the flying hours of the average IAF pilot.
Oh stop crying US still has thousands of fighters made in the 70s and they fly them more hours since USAF and Navy seems like they are always in some sort of combat. IAF doesn't come close to flight hours and quantity yet IAF is known as a crashy air force.

Remember you started this by saying Malaysians aren't good at anything.
 

Lolwa

Senior member
Feb 6, 2020
1,553
1,004
Delhi
You're just making yourself look dumb which I know isn't hard for you. I posted a Boeing and other sources of the F-18E's mach 1.8 speed but you choose to bury your head up your nanu nanu.

Oh stop crying US still has thousands of fighters made in the 70s and they fly them more hours since USAF and Navy seems like they are always in some sort of combat. IAF doesn't come close to flight hours and quantity yet IAF is known as a crashy air force.

Remember you started this by saying Malaysians aren't good at anything.
IAF has similar flight hours to nato standard pilots. Stop making up stuff you have barely any knowledge about. And I would love to know any 70's aircraft the USAF is flying still apart from the re-engined b-52's. Also stop calling a2g in uncontested airspace as combat missions.
Also you haven't proved anywhere that the Malaysians are good at anything.
posted a Boeing and other sources of the F-18E's mach 1.8 speed but you choose to bury your head up your nanu nanu.
It's well known that the super hornets are limited to mach 1.6 by that standard the French can claim that the Rafale can do mach 2 too
 

Innominate

Well-Known member
Jun 23, 2021
1,070
701
California
IAF has similar flight hours to nato standard pilots. Stop making up stuff you have barely any knowledge about. And I would love to know any 70's aircraft the USAF is flying still apart from the re-engined b-52's. Also stop calling a2g in uncontested airspace as combat missions.
Also you haven't proved anywhere that the Malaysians are good at anything.

Lol. No IAF doesn't fly hours wise like the USAF and USN. USAF deploys all over the world including combat areas and USN patrols the oceans including combat areas.

So IAF mig-21s and other 70s fighters IAF flies have not been upgraded? Puh-leeze.
It's well known that the super hornets are limited to mach 1.6 by that standard the French can claim that the Rafale can do mach 2 too

My Boeing source said Mach 1.8 and your response is "it's well known that SH are limited to mach 1.6?" What kind of a dumb response is that?

French can't claim that because they claim mach 1.8 just like the Boeing source I posted saying mach 1.8.

MODELF/A-18E
CREW1-2
ENGINE2 x General Electric F414-GE-400, 10000kg
WEIGHTS
Take-off weight29937 kg66000 lb
Empty weight13387 kg29513 lb
DIMENSIONS
Wingspan11.43 m38 ft 6 in
Length18.31 m60 ft 1 in
Height4.88 m16 ft 0 in
Wing area46.45 m2499.98 sq ft
PERFORMANCE
Max. speed1.8M1.8M
Ceiling15240 m50000 ft
Range1500 km932 miles


Rafale F1/A model clean configuration with M88 engines did mach 1.8.

F-18E blk 1 clean configuration did mach 1.8.

Deal with.
 

Parthu

Gessler
Team StratFront
Dec 1, 2017
1,066
2,222
25
Vizag, India
Australia is upgrading their SH to block lll and at this stage, still intends to retire them midlife. What I can assure you is that regardless of the hours left. The USN will not run 3 platforms on a carrier, the SH-III. F-35 and FA-xx. Pick 2.

They've had a mixed fleet of A-6, F-14 & F/A-18 throughout Desert Shield, Desert Storm & Southern Watch. That's 3 generations of aircraft (1960, 1970 & 1978 first flights) on the same carrier.

 

Optimist

Active member
Oct 31, 2021
414
191
Australia
They've had a mixed fleet of A-6, F-14 & F/A-18 throughout Desert Shield, Desert Storm & Southern Watch. That's 3 generations of aircraft (1960, 1970 & 1978 first flights) on the same carrier.
The same war and it was their last deployment, but I doubt very much they would have run them off the same carrier. It's just too hard to have all the gear necessary to support it.
 

Lolwa

Senior member
Feb 6, 2020
1,553
1,004
Delhi
Lol. No IAF doesn't fly hours wise like the USAF and USN. USAF deploys all over the world including combat areas and USN patrols the oceans including combat areas.

So IAF mig-21s and other 70s fighters IAF flies have not been upgraded? Puh-leeze.


My Boeing source said Mach 1.8 and your response is "it's well known that SH are limited to mach 1.6?" What kind of a dumb response is that?

French can't claim that because they claim mach 1.8 just like the Boeing source I posted saying mach 1.8.

MODELF/A-18E
CREW1-2
ENGINE2 x General Electric F414-GE-400, 10000kg
WEIGHTS
Take-off weight29937 kg66000 lb
Empty weight13387 kg29513 lb
DIMENSIONS
Wingspan11.43 m38 ft 6 in
Length18.31 m60 ft 1 in
Height4.88 m16 ft 0 in
Wing area46.45 m2499.98 sq ft
PERFORMANCE
Max. speed1.8M1.8M
Ceiling15240 m50000 ft
Range1500 km932 miles


Rafale F1/A model clean configuration with M88 engines did mach 1.8.

F-18E blk 1 clean configuration did mach 1.8.

Deal with.
The indian mig's have avionics upgrade but continue to use pos tumansky engines so nowhere close to the comparison to an 8 engined b-52
 

Optimist

Active member
Oct 31, 2021
414
191
Australia
Parthu. I'll also add it was war time and they had the A-6 prowler deployed. The USN like Australia also ran aircraft from land. It is probably if they ran the A-6 from a carrier, it would have been with the prowler force and with either the F-14 or Fa-18. To my knowledge, they haven't run the hornet, super hornet and F-35 on the same carrier.
 

randomradio

Senior Member
Nov 30, 2017
14,521
10,768
India
Parthu. I'll also add it was war time and they had the A-6 prowler deployed. The USN like Australia also ran aircraft from land. It is probably if they ran the A-6 from a carrier, it would have been with the prowler force and with either the F-14 or Fa-18. To my knowledge, they haven't run the hornet, super hornet and F-35 on the same carrier.

The Hornets have been dead for sometime. Most carrier air wings only have Super Hornets. Only 3 carrier air wings have one F-35 squadron each, one of the squadrons belongs to the Marine.

By 2035, we should likely see 1 F-35 squadron in each wing, alongside 3 SH squadrons. And between 2035-45, we should see the F-35, SH and NGAD operating side by side until most of the SHs retire. Some carrier air wings should still see SH operating with the NGAD and F-35 until after 2050 or so. At least 6 SH squadrons should be operable until then.