Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

Cole_phelps

Well-Known member
Jun 19, 2019
643
773
India

This is exactly what Chinese wanted to do with Indian army, to humiliate them and send message to politicians. But when it came down to real fighting, PLA backed off and started negotiations. That’s the reason why no Indian politician is interested in dialogue with china, this itself gives away how much we take them seriously. All China is doing right now is pompous crying and sulking on twitter. Yeah you won battle with sticks and stones thanks to your armour and shields. Our army isn’t used to fight wars of kind found in books collecting dust across libraries.
 

screambowl

Senior member
Dec 19, 2017
2,559
1,168
switzerland
This is exactly what Chinese wanted to do with Indian army, to humiliate them and send message to politicians. But when it came down to real fighting, PLA backed off and started negotiations. That’s the reason why no Indian politician is interested in dialogue with china, this itself gives away how much we take them seriously. All China is doing right now is pompous crying and sulking on twitter. Yeah you won battle with sticks and stones thanks to your armour and shields. Our army isn’t used to fight wars of kind found in books collecting dust across libraries.

They are doing what Pakistan does. Changing history in books. And thanks to MEA who advised PMO that yes they can negotiate. This Jaishankar has become a 'panoti. '

I will not be surprized, if after 10 years Indian kids study 'Loss in Galwan' as a topic in SST. Chinese just need to bribe few in India.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolwa

Lolwa

Well-Known member
Feb 6, 2020
1,212
834
Delhi

so that means Pakistani NSA will also not come? They want to sabotage this meeting and make it worth no value.
Implying we want the Chinese and Pakistanis in this deal. The GoI has to get out of the delusion that indio-pak/sino relations can get back to pre-2014 levels
 

screambowl

Senior member
Dec 19, 2017
2,559
1,168
switzerland
Implying we want the Chinese and Pakistanis in this deal. The GoI has to get out of the delusion that indio-pak/sino relations can get back to pre-2014 levels

Chinese are not completely wrong. It's power play. If you are powerful, either convince not to fight and come to conculsion through peace talks or, fight a war and create a new treaty when ever there is a change in government or status of a nation.

a) British India did some border agreements with the Qing dynasty regarding boundary of Tibet and Sikkim in 1890. Without representatives from Tibet.


b) In 1904 the same Britishers invaded Tibet and signed another treaty of 1904. This was done to counter Russian expansion, communism. They threw the Qing dynasty out of Tibet.

c) When britishers left , India as a democratic nation had no treaty with the chinese,. Except for Dogras and Sikhs in Aksai Chin. So new treaty was signed as panchsheel which contradicted India recognizing Tibet as Chinese territory. Because if Tibet was to be given to China it should be complete Tibet. No where India said this part of Tibet remains within India.




Neither Qing is there nor British India or Dogras. So now it's an open border all the way from Taiwan to Durand line.
 

AbRaj

Senior member
Dec 6, 2017
2,068
1,542
Republic of Wadiya

So PLA left that area in 1959 after killing nearly 100 IA soldiers. And Chacha Ji decided to not take that area because apparently it was too remote to maintain control.
So Chinese helped him by moving LAC nearer by occupying that area after few years.
 
Last edited:

Lolwa

Well-Known member
Feb 6, 2020
1,212
834
Delhi

So PLA left that area in 1959 after killing nearly 100 IA soldiers. And Chacha Ji decided to not take that area because apparently it was too remote to maintain control.
So Chinese helped him by moving LAC nearer by occupying that area after few years.
Every problem of this country begins and ends with chachaji
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AbRaj

RISING SUN

Senior member
Dec 3, 2017
10,421
5,262
that was for vehicles, but chips used in IT like mobile, computer ..etc has seen a lot of spike. This has happened after huawei was completely blocked from getting new chips. Some say this was due to work from home but given that even after a year things have not showed any improvement, there may be other things in play.
Recently our management went to country's political and financial leadership and post discussion, however what we hear isn't pleasant at all. Market ( and I mean Banking system) has already started facing the dryness. As time passes, it's going to go public if not drastic measures taken like Demonitization, or perhaps government might be onto something?
 

jetray

Senior member
Mar 15, 2018
1,601
1,007
India
Recently our management went to country's political and financial leadership and post discussion, however what we hear isn't pleasant at all. Market ( and I mean Banking system) has already started facing the dryness. As time passes, it's going to go public if not drastic measures taken like Demonitization, or perhaps government might be onto something?
Any action which involves investment will take atleast 2 years or more. No one is selling those fabs for the time being. Semiconductors is the new oil, not having it is going to severely impact the economy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RISING SUN

RISING SUN

Senior member
Dec 3, 2017
10,421
5,262
Any action which involves investment will take atleast 2 years or more. No one is selling those fabs for the time being. Semiconductors is the new oil, not having it is going to severely impact the economy.
Approx 4-5 years to pump sufficient quantity. Question is whether multiple industries will survive till then as COVID has impacted most of organizations negatively there is no denying there. Let's hope for the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jetray

STEPHEN COHEN

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
6,724
4,185