I have mentioned in previous posts times where you were wrongly/inaccurately attributing something to constitution. In this reply too you mentioned 'Right to question on any and every matter' as a right given by Constitution however this is very inaccurate.
Article 19(1)(a) says Every citizen has right to speech and freedom of expression. This is interpreted by SC as without information you cannot express yourself therefore 'Right to information' is a fundamental right, which became the basis of RTI ACT 2005.
Now When you read more Article 19 (2) -
Which provides the grounds where freedom of expression and RTI derived from it are subject to restrictions and you can not ask everything on every matter from government, that's not the right. Privileged information, confidential information and information detrimental to national security and law and order can not be obtained even when RTI is fundamental right.
And you don't need to be so touchy expressing your opinion when you think you are right. I get lot of angry people here when I criticize policy of Modiji, most of them making personal comments and not on topic, part of life, don't get demotivated by it.
I replied you point by point and your question is not a hard question, it's rhetoric.
There are 6 clauses in Article 19 which can be base to your question. Clause 2, clause 3, clause 4 and clause 5 hold answer to your question you have to read them in consonance with Clause 1 to get full picture otherwise you will keep repeating same mistake.
What you and @S.A.T.A are talking about are features of democracy and liberal principles and calling them rights granted by Constitution or GoI but it's not. Indian Constitution is very flexible and very pragmatic to ensure a nation of 1.25 billion works pragmatically and not get dragged into law suits of idealism.
