Operation Sindoor: Aftermath

https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2025-11/2025_Annual_Report_to_Congress.pdf page 108-109

Following the May 2025 India-Pakistan border crisis, China initiated a disinformation campaign to hinder sales of French Rafale aircraft in favor of its own J-35s, using fake social media accounts to propagate AI images of supposed “debris” from the planes that China’s weaponry destroyed.

In 2024, pro-China online actors used AI-generated news anchors and fake social media accounts with AI-generated profile pictures to sow divisions in the United States on issues such as drug use, immigration, and abortion.

...

China expanded its military cooperation with Pakistan in 2025, compounding its own security tensions with India. In November and December 2024, China and Pakistan held the three-week Warrior-VIII counterterrorism drills, and in February 2025, China’s navy participated in Pakistan’s multinational AMAN drills, highlighting China’s and Pakistan’s growing defense cooperation. India’s commentators viewed the drills as losses in their relationship with China and as direct security threats to its territorial positions.

Pakistan’s military success over India in its four-day clash showcased Chinese weaponry. While characterization of this conflict as a “proxy war” may overstate China’s role as an instigator, Beijing opportunistically leveraged the conflict to test and advertise the sophistication of its weapons, useful in the contexts of its ongoing border tensions with India and its expanding defense industry goals. As Pakistan’s largest defense supplier, China provided approximately 82 percent of the country’s arms imports from 2019 to 2023. This clash was the first time China’s modern weapons systems, including the HQ-9 air defense system, PL-15 air-to-air missiles, and J-10 fighter aircraft were used in active combat, serving as a real-world field experiment. China reportedly offered to sell 40 J-35 fifth-generation fighter jets, KJ-500 aircraft, and ballistic missile defense systems to Pakistan in June 2025. That same month, Pakistan announced a 20 percent increase in its 2025–2026 defense budget, raising planned expenditures to $9 billion despite an overall budget decrease.

In the weeks after the conflict, Chinese embassies hailed the successes of its systems in the India-Pakistan clash, seeking to bolster weapons sales.

Pakistan’s use of Chinese weapons to down French Rafale fighter jets used by India also became a particular selling point for Chinese Embassy defense sales efforts despite the fact that only three jets flown by India’s military were reportedly downed and all may not have been Rafales.

According to French intelligence, China initiated a disinformation campaign to hinder sales of French Rafales in favor of its own J-35s, and it used fake social media ac- counts to propagate AI and video game images of supposed “debris” from the planes China’s weaponry destroyed. Chinese Embassy officials convinced Indonesia to halt a purchase of Rafale jets already in process, furthering China’s inroads into other regional actors’ military procurements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shan
I need help in understanding why many of the Indian army generals are so peaceniks? Can someone please answer this?
Over the years, I came across many articles and recently videos where the generals' responses to questions of terrorism or kinetic against Pakistanis action were very disheartening, illogical and even many a times shameful.

Below are 2 video links that I came across recently:

Time frame 4:30 - 5:30
He even called India's initial response during Op Sindoor as ridiculous.

Another one between 1:12:18 - 1:17:18


@vstol Jockey, @Rajput Lion @marich01 and any other experts?
 
l
I need help in understanding why many of the Indian army generals are so peaceniks? Can someone please answer this?
Over the years, I came across many articles and recently videos where the generals' responses to questions of terrorism or kinetic against Pakistanis action were very disheartening, illogical and even many a times shameful.

Below are 2 video links that I came across recently:

Time frame 4:30 - 5:30
He even called India's initial response during Op Sindoor as ridiculous.

Another one between 1:12:18 - 1:17:18


@vstol Jockey, @Rajput Lion @marich01 and any other experts?
lol its very simple. They need to be sensationalist and go against other opinions if they want to get clicks and be paid. nothing more. No general worth their salt will be going around larping to news channels continuously. The media house needs views and the best way to get that is having a controversial opinion.
 
We didn't lose to pak on military front, but on international narrative pak had upper hand.

For them not losing the territory is victory, shooting an aircraft is victory for Pakistan. On the other hand,we really don't have anything beyond hiting terror outfits, and we extend to military target only on miniscule threshold to stop pak going full war on us.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: screambowl and Paro

If he is saying that then all out war could happen. Last time he said that they have inputs that India will strike and India struck. We are talking about ballistic missile in these era and drones. And by looking at how packed the cities are it can be very bad.Right now Indian government has time, they can give civil defence training to the civilians, better than being caught with pants down like in Corona or Poonch when Pakistani army shelled the city

Quarterly this must be exercised:

- All schools and colleges should be given training to students in first aid and survival basics by NDRF or Medical fraternity.
- All Hospitals must be asked to arrange resources on war footing for patients who want special care, senior citizens and emergency cases.
- Railways and Metros should be asked to simulate operations during war and identify challenges
- Farmer and Food Industry should be trained to work or find safe and alternate sow and harvest practice during the skirmish
- Air, Roads and Sea transport must identify the challenges for operations during the skirmish
- Water ministry must identify ways to prevent water contamination
..
the list should be prepared by UPSC sahab along with military professionals but half of the points are given here only. It will be way easier for military to fight and also for political leadership to take decision if these things are practiced in advance.

Make a private thread or an open thread to discuss these points if possible.
 
Last edited:
There is always a moron who is willing to cling to 'aman is possible now'. After all they view us with such friendly intentions. I never understood why such needless comments are needed especially after the attack in Delhi. Talk like normal lads in an expo = Sab theek hai.
He is a pundjabi naa
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shan
Good question. By “US annual report,” you’re likely referring to the 2025 annual report from the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). Here’s what that report says about Operation Sindoor:




Key Points from the US Report on Operation Sindoor​


  1. Characterization of the Conflict
    • The report refers to the Pahalgam attack (April 2025) as an “insurgent attack,” rather than purely a terrorist massacre.
    • It describes a “four-day clash” (May 7–10, 2025) between India and Pakistan as part of this conflict.
  2. Pakistan’s Military Success
    • The report claims “Pakistan’s military success over India in its four-day clash showcased Chinese weaponry.”
    • This is a controversial framing, and Indian political leaders have strongly criticized it.
  3. China’s Role & Disinformation Campaign
    • According to the report, China “opportunistically leveraged” the conflict to test and advertise its weapons systems.
    • The report alleges that Chinese embassies promoted the narrative that their weapons (used by Pakistan) were effective against India, particularly emphasizing the downing of Indian jets.
    • Specifically, the USCC cites French intelligence to say that China spread AI-generated and video-game-style images of jet debris on social media to suggest they destroyed Rafale aircraft.
    • This disinformation was allegedly aimed at hurting sales of the French Rafale fighter jets and boosting its own J-35 aircraft exports.
    • The report also claims that China tried to use this narrative commercially: Chinese embassy officials pushing the idea that their weapons succeeded, to bolster defense sales.
    • It is mentioned that China offered J-35 jets, KJ-500 aircraft, and missile defence systems to Pakistan after Sindoor.
  4. Diplomatic & Strategic Implications
    • The report suggests that China used the clash as a demonstration of their defense tech capabilities, potentially to attract more arms buyers.
    • It does not fully label the conflict a “proxy war” but cautions that calling it one “may overstate” China’s role as initiator.
    • On India–China relations, the report notes that while there were high-level meetings in 2025, many of the agreements or de-escalation steps remained “largely conceptual” with little follow-through.
  5. Controversy & Criticism
    • Indian political figures, notably Jairam Ramesh (Congress MP), have strongly criticized the report, calling it a “severe diplomatic setback.”
    • The criticism centers on how the report frames the Pahalgam attack, the “military success” claim for Pakistan, and the alleged Chinese disinformation campaign.



Interpretation & Implications​


  • The report is not an intelligence estimate, but analysis and policy advice for the U.S. Congress.
  • By highlighting China’s role, the USCC is framing Operation Sindoor partly as a strategic opportunity for China to showcase its weapons to the world.
  • The use of disinformation narrative suggests that China is not just a passive arms supplier, but is actively engaging in information warfare to market its defense products.
  • The claim of “Pakistan’s military success” is politically sensitive, especially in India, leading to strong pushback from Indian leaders.



If you like, I can pull up direct quotes from the actual USCC report (with page numbers) on Operation Sindoor. Do you want me to do that?
Good question. By “US annual report,” you’re likely referring to the 2025 annual report from the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). Here’s what that report says about Operation Sindoor:




Key Points from the US Report on Operation Sindoor​


  1. Characterization of the Conflict
    • The report refers to the Pahalgam attack (April 2025) as an “insurgent attack,” rather than purely a terrorist massacre.
    • It describes a “four-day clash” (May 7–10, 2025) between India and Pakistan as part of this conflict.
  2. Pakistan’s Military Success
    • The report claims “Pakistan’s military success over India in its four-day clash showcased Chinese weaponry.”
    • This is a controversial framing, and Indian political leaders have strongly criticized it.
  3. China’s Role & Disinformation Campaign
    • According to the report, China “opportunistically leveraged” the conflict to test and advertise its weapons systems.
    • The report alleges that Chinese embassies promoted the narrative that their weapons (used by Pakistan) were effective against India, particularly emphasizing the downing of Indian jets.
    • Specifically, the USCC cites French intelligence to say that China spread AI-generated and video-game-style images of jet debris on social media to suggest they destroyed Rafale aircraft.
    • This disinformation was allegedly aimed at hurting sales of the French Rafale fighter jets and boosting its own J-35 aircraft exports.
    • The report also claims that China tried to use this narrative commercially: Chinese embassy officials pushing the idea that their weapons succeeded, to bolster defense sales.
    • It is mentioned that China offered J-35 jets, KJ-500 aircraft, and missile defence systems to Pakistan after Sindoor.
  4. Diplomatic & Strategic Implications
    • The report suggests that China used the clash as a demonstration of their defense tech capabilities, potentially to attract more arms buyers.
    • It does not fully label the conflict a “proxy war” but cautions that calling it one “may overstate” China’s role as initiator.
    • On India–China relations, the report notes that while there were high-level meetings in 2025, many of the agreements or de-escalation steps remained “largely conceptual” with little follow-through.
  5. Controversy & Criticism
    • Indian political figures, notably Jairam Ramesh (Congress MP), have strongly criticized the report, calling it a “severe diplomatic setback.”
    • The criticism centers on how the report frames the Pahalgam attack, the “military success” claim for Pakistan, and the alleged Chinese disinformation campaign.



Interpretation & Implications​


  • The report is not an intelligence estimate, but analysis and policy advice for the U.S. Congress.
  • By highlighting China’s role, the USCC is framing Operation Sindoor partly as a strategic opportunity for China to showcase its weapons to the world.
  • The use of disinformation narrative suggests that China is not just a passive arms supplier, but is actively engaging in information warfare to market its defense products.
  • The claim of “Pakistan’s military success” is politically sensitive, especially in India, leading to strong pushback from Indian leaders.



If you like, I can pull up direct quotes from the actual USCC report (with page numbers) on Operation Sindoor. Do you want me to do that?
This what Chat GPT says when asking it on operation sindoor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FalconSlayers
Military Operations sometimes have their related impact(s) revealed at later times. Most of the information related to damage and circumstances related to them come out years or decades later as information is declassified.


There are many things that are still unknown about Part 1.0. Let's see what comes out gradually.

A recent video in which she shares her views and on ground details as part of her book promotions.

 
So i see mamy Indians online, condemning Pakistani journalist laughing while recording Tejas crash.

Remember how many of you made memes of the dead bodies at Bur Khan air Base?

Hate only generates hate.

Normally I never make fun of a fallen soldier, because he fights for a noble cause , for his country.

I arguue with those making fun of enemy soldiers. But this time i am neutral.
I saw induans making cartoons of our dead soldiers.