Operation Sindoor: India Strikes Terroist Camps Inside Pakitsan

Pakistan will not be our test subject. Because the war between India and Pakistan is too low-level. We want the air combat theory between fifth-generation aircraft. We want the coordinated combat theory between unmanned wingman and manned aircraft, and we want the combat theory about the US distributed lethality and network-centric warfare.
The combat theories of the air forces of both sides in this war did not even surpass the combat theories of the US military during the Iraq War.
The simplest example is that India and Pakistan do not even conduct SEAD operations, and there are no dedicated electronic warfare aircraft to provide accompanying interference.
That's very well said. Will guys actually ever fight a war? Or is this boasting going to continue onwards till the next decade as well?
 
That's very well said. Will guys actually ever fight a war? Or is this boasting going to continue onwards till the next decade as well?

They still haven't recovered from the humiliation and severe thrashing that Vietnam gave them in 1979 (which is their last major war). All their boasting and bravado is only on social media and online forums.:ROFLMAO::LOL:
 
They still haven't recovered from the humiliation and severe thrashing that Vietnam gave them in 1979 (which is their last major war). All their boasting and bravado is only on social media and online forums.:ROFLMAO::LOL:
Precisely.
Munir getting promoted to Field Marshal
Announcement of getting stealth fighter ..

Seems like more of psyc ops.

Why not more J10 ? Failed ?
It was always one. Since 1965 they rely on propoganda and paper victories. Each of their "wars" is a lie to be sold to their people.
 
Pakistan will not be our test subject. Because the war between India and Pakistan is too low-level. We want the air combat theory between fifth-generation aircraft. We want the coordinated combat theory between unmanned wingman and manned aircraft, and we want the combat theory about the US distributed lethality and network-centric warfare.
The combat theories of the air forces of both sides in this war did not even surpass the combat theories of the US military during the Iraq War.
The simplest example is that India and Pakistan do not even conduct SEAD operations, and there are no dedicated electronic warfare aircraft to provide accompanying interference.

TLDR - We dont have time to pass 10th class but want to write a doctoral thesis.

Your head is so up your behind, you could create a perpetual loop and solve the incoming Chinese food crisis.

Let me break it down for you.

You absolutely DO NEED data on how the stealth component behaves in a multilayered AD environment. Without that data how do you plan on building the first phase of your air superiority doctrine.

Given the track record of your engineering firms, I will throw in the need for Engine performance, engine life and airframe health data after high G maneuvers as well.

Iraqi airforce except in few instances could not stand up to the BVR tactics and their planes were brought down during enforcing of the no fly zone PRIOR to the Iraq War.

There was no Air war in the Iraq war. Its a shock and awe style SEAD campaign where one side possessed an insurmountable tech edge while the other side was riddled with legacy platforms, no force multipliers and poor training.

USAF did not show any combat theories that PAF or IAF did not emulate.

While we are talking about combat theories, which ever bat munching, mao tai chugging clown taught the PAF to spam Pl-15s from the edge of the envelope needs to be fired. Like seriously - Fired.

And most importantly IAF did run a very nice SEAD campaign. The factory seconds that you sold Pakistan claiming to be originals did not work as promised. Are you giving them a refund?
 
TLDR - We dont have time to pass 10th class but want to write a doctoral thesis.

Your head is so up your behind, you could create a perpetual loop and solve the incoming Chinese food crisis.

Let me break it down for you.

You absolutely DO NEED data on how the stealth component behaves in a multilayered AD environment. Without that data how do you plan on building the first phase of your air superiority doctrine.

Given the track record of your engineering firms, I will throw in the need for Engine performance, engine life and airframe health data after high G maneuvers as well.

Iraqi airforce except in few instances could not stand up to the BVR tactics and their planes were brought down during enforcing of the no fly zone PRIOR to the Iraq War.

There was no Air war in the Iraq war. Its a shock and awe style SEAD campaign where one side possessed an insurmountable tech edge while the other side was riddled with legacy platforms, no force multipliers and poor training.

USAF did not show any combat theories that PAF or IAF did not emulate.

While we are talking about combat theories, which ever bat munching, mao tai chugging clown taught the PAF to spam Pl-15s from the edge of the envelope needs to be fired. Like seriously - Fired.

And most importantly IAF did run a very nice SEAD campaign. The factory seconds that you sold Pakistan claiming to be originals did not work as promised. Are you giving them a refund?
Such a stupid idea. About 10 years ago, the US Air Force publicly stated that the two-way data link of the BVR missile can provide revolutionary changes for future air combat, and the fighter will only serve as a missile launch platform.
About five years ago, the US Air Force stated that the kill chain of PL-17 plus KJ500 is an issue that the United States should take very seriously.
And today in 2025, Pakistan used a simplified version of this air combat theory to successfully defeat the Indian Air Force in this conflict.
And what does the Indian Air Force understand about air combat? Just buy a few gold-plated fighter jets from Europe.
 
Such a stupid idea. About 10 years ago, the US Air Force publicly stated that the two-way data link of the BVR missile can provide revolutionary changes for future air combat, and the fighter will only serve as a missile launch platform.
About five years ago, the US Air Force stated that the kill chain of PL-17 plus KJ500 is an issue that the United States should take very seriously.
And today in 2025, Pakistan used a simplified version of this air combat theory to successfully defeat the Indian Air Force in this conflict.
And what does the Indian Air Force understand about air combat? Just buy a few gold-plated fighter jets from Europe.
yes, yes, yes....China numba oneeeee. End of discussion. Clock out of your cubicle. Crack a beer and sleep. Dream of Hangzhou chicks and rest peacefully. Whose better Zhao Lusi or Dilraba?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Rajput Lion
component behaves in a multilayered AD environment. Without that data how do you plan on building the first phase of your air superiority doctrine.

Given the track record of your engineering firms, I will throw in the need for Engine performance, engine life and airframe health data after high G maneuvers as well.

Iraqi airforce except in few instances could not stand up to the BVR tactics and their planes were brought down during enforcing
1000001846.jpg
I am flattering the Indian Air Force by saying it is not up to the standards of the Iraq War. The Indian Air Force is not even up to the standards of the 1991 Gulf War.
During the Gulf War, the U.S. military formed a formation of four F-15 fighters, with early warning aircraft, electronic warfare aircraft and electronic reconnaissance aircraft as the core. After the early warning aircraft and electronic reconnaissance aircraft discovered enemy air or ground targets, the electronic warfare aircraft maintained suppression of the enemy radar, and the fighters launched missiles for beyond-visual-range strikes.

1,How many AWACS does India have? Only five, and no one even knows if the Rafale and Su-30 can establish effective data link communication with these Israeli-made AWACS.
2,Does India have electronic warfare aircraft? No. During the Gulf War, the United States had EA-6B and EA-111, while India in 2025 only has some tiny Israeli electronic warfare pods and some backward Russian ones.
3,Does India have any aircraft capable of performing this mission? Only some Su-30s can carry some KH31s, and these unfortunate aircraft need to launch a death charge against the enemy alone without the cover of electronic warfare aircraft.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Such a stupid idea. About 10 years ago, the US Air Force publicly stated that the two-way data link of the BVR missile can provide revolutionary changes for future air combat, and the fighter will only serve as a missile launch platform.
About five years ago, the US Air Force stated that the kill chain of PL-17 plus KJ500 is an issue that the United States should take very seriously.
And today in 2025, Pakistan used a simplified version of this air combat theory to successfully defeat the Indian Air Force in this conflict.
And what does the Indian Air Force understand about air combat? Just buy a few gold-plated fighter jets from Europe.

Statutory Disclaimer - Some Chinese feelings were hurt by my previous post.
Disclaimer addendum - This one will hurt as well

I know English isnt your normal mode of communicating so lets me to try to use simple words to explain it to you.

Missile hitting a target is a complicated exercise of mathematics (numbers you know from school - 1,2,3... 5*2=10 etc), physics (study of matter, its states, motion), chemistry (for the stuff you put behind the missile to make it go zoom, weeeeeeeee and finally boom !!! ) and engineering (dont even bother)

For your rocket to hit a plane, it needs to calculate speed (it means how fast its going), trajectory (its current and projected path in 3 (thats 1,2 and 3) dimensions and also adjust for any radical course changes (suddenly moving differently)

The farther the target, the lesser the chance of a hit due to a more complex intercept solution. When you dont hit something the missile runs out of fuel ( the chemical thing that makes the missile go zooom weeeeee) and falls like a dud. Thats why India collected random parts of your missile and showed them on the TV (you know where you see party lectures and barney the dinosaur)

When you fling PL-15s like a little emperor having a bad day with nothing to show for it, its not called air combat, its called a tantrum. Which isnt good behavior and will get you a time out.

India's air combat results were for the world to see when your HQ-9 did not stop IAF and IAF ended up roughhousing Kirana and Nur Khan. Ouch !!!
 
I highly doubt Pak getting J35,
Without sufficient numbers and more bases
Without airbase defence upgrade
Without sufficient missiles & bombs that can fit into J35...

It ll be a single use fighter.
 
Such a stupid idea. About 10 years ago, the US Air Force publicly stated that the two-way data link of the BVR missile can provide revolutionary changes for future air combat, and the fighter will only serve as a missile launch platform.
About five years ago, the US Air Force stated that the kill chain of PL-17 plus KJ500 is an issue that the United States should take very seriously.
And today in 2025, Pakistan used a simplified version of this air combat theory to successfully defeat the Indian Air Force in this conflict.
And what does the Indian Air Force understand about air combat? Just buy a few gold-plated fighter jets from Europe.
PAF got thrased so badly by IAF that they simply tucked their tail and ran away. All your PL-15s hit nothing. Plus MKI and our other fighters downed 7 of PAF jets.

MKI + BrahMos conbo, Harpy drones, Rafale + Scalp-EG, Jaguar with Rampage absolutely destroyed your HQ-9B/P's & other Chinese advance ADS. What's more Su-30MKI flew unobstructed over Sargodha after pounding the airbase.

This is total air-dominance you imbecile. Now off with your Pakistani-Han propaganda.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: YoungWolf
View attachment 43535
I am flattering the Indian Air Force by saying it is not up to the standards of the Iraq War. The Indian Air Force is not even up to the standards of the 1991 Gulf War.
During the Gulf War, the U.S. military formed a formation of four F-15 fighters, with early warning aircraft, electronic warfare aircraft and electronic reconnaissance aircraft as the core. After the early warning aircraft and electronic reconnaissance aircraft discovered enemy air or ground targets, the electronic warfare aircraft maintained suppression of the enemy radar, and the fighters launched missiles for beyond-visual-range strikes.

1,How many AWACS does India have? Only five, and no one even knows if the Rafale and Su-30 can establish effective data link communication with these Israeli-made AWACS.
2,Does India have electronic warfare aircraft? No. During the Gulf War, the United States had EA-6B and EA-111, while India in 2025 only has some tiny Israeli electronic warfare pods and some backward Russian ones.
3,Does India have any aircraft capable of performing this mission? Only some Su-30s can carry some KH31s, and these unfortunate aircraft need to launch a death charge against the enemy alone without the cover of electronic warfare aircraft.

Oh my, these are not bum burns, these are chemical bum burns..... try sitting on an ice pack. Maybe it will help.

If your idea of Radar coverage is only limited to AWACS, you need to sue your instructors for a refund.

IAF's EW doesnt work? Then why did the HQ-9 fall flatter than Miss China's backside?

In case your opium induced haze isnt over, IAF did rampage of Pakland, ask your buddies, listen to their tales of woe, extend a handkerchief to wipe their tears.
 
Statutory Disclaimer - Some Chinese feelings were hurt by my previous post.
Disclaimer addendum - This one will hurt as well

I know English isnt your normal mode of communicating so lets me to try to use simple words to explain it to you.

Missile hitting a target is a complicated exercise of mathematics (numbers you know from school - 1,2,3... 5*2=10 etc), physics (study of matter, its states, motion), chemistry (for the stuff you put behind the missile to make it go zoom, weeeeeeeee and finally boom !!! ) and engineering (dont even bother)

For your rocket to hit a plane, it needs to calculate speed (it means how fast its going), trajectory (its current and projected path in 3 (thats 1,2 and 3) dimensions and also adjust for any radical course changes (suddenly moving differently)

The farther the target, the lesser the chance of a hit due to a more complex intercept solution. When you dont hit something the missile runs out of fuel ( the chemical thing that makes the missile go zooom weeeeee) and falls like a dud. Thats why India collected random parts of your missile and showed them on the TV (you know where you see party lectures and barney the dinosaur)

When you fling PL-15s like a little emperor having a bad day with nothing to show for it, its not called air combat, its called a tantrum. Which isnt good behavior and will get you a time out.

India's air combat results were for the world to see when your HQ-9 did not stop IAF and IAF ended up roughhousing Kirana and Nur Khan. Ouch !!!
Man, I have a master's degree in mechanics. Don't you know what a dual-pulse engine is? When the missile is very close to the target, the second stage engine is activated to obtain higher energy and increase the terminal maneuverability of the missile.
Or the Meteor missile, which uses ramjet power, has a very high average speed. The missile has a long power section. When approaching the target, the energy is still abundant.
As for you using the wreckage of the PL-15 missile to make a fuss, the Indians' behavior is like a primitive man facing a machine gun, pointing at the bullets on the ground that didn't hit him. It's like mocking the machine gun for being useless.
 
I highly doubt Pak getting J35,
Without sufficient numbers and more bases
Without airbase defence upgrade
Without sufficient missiles & bombs that can fit into J35...

It ll be a single use fighter.
It's a lock. IAF knows this. Only two counters exist for us in the next 5-10 years:

1. MKI UPG. with Virupaksha + Gandiva.

2. Su-57(single or customized tandem dual-seater) with Indian radar, IRST and MCs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RationalGuy
Oh my, these are not bum burns, these are chemical bum burns..... try sitting on an ice pack. Maybe it will help.

If your idea of Radar coverage is only limited to AWACS, you need to sue your instructors for a refund.

IAF's EW doesnt work? Then why did the HQ-9 fall flatter than Miss China's backside?

In case your opium induced haze isnt over, IAF did rampage of Pakland, ask your buddies, listen to their tales of woe, extend a handkerchief to wipe their tears.
India is wreaking havoc in Pakistan. Don't be ridiculous. So far, apart from launching BrahMos from a distance, does the Indian Air Force still have the courage to deploy large-scale fighter jets to compete with Pakistan for air supremacy?
 
Man, I have a master's degree in mechanics. Don't you know what a dual-pulse engine is? When the missile is very close to the target, the second stage engine is activated to obtain higher energy and increase the terminal maneuverability of the missile.
Or the Meteor missile, which uses ramjet power, has a very high average speed. The missile has a long power section. When approaching the target, the energy is still abundant.
As for you using the wreckage of the PL-15 missile to make a fuss, the Indians' behavior is like a primitive man facing a machine gun, pointing at the bullets on the ground that didn't hit him. It's like mocking the machine gun for being useless.
Woman (allegedly) I have a degree in Engineering and a wealth of experience in busting Chinese BS.

While you are good at reading the China equivalent of Wikipedia you still didn’t comprehend the need for a strong intercept solution. From the behaviour of your systems looks like neither did their designers.

You are only partially correct that I m mocking the PL-15. I am also mocking you.

Finally if you can’t hit a man with a machine gun, do yourself a favor and use the gun on yourself. With your quality there is a good chance it will miss again
 
PAF got thrased so badly by IAF that they simply tucked their tail and ran away. All your PL-15s hit nothing. Plus MKI and our other fighters downed 7 of PAF jets.

MKI + BrahMos conbo, Harpy drones, Rafale + Scalp-EG, Jaguar with Rampage absolutely destroyed your HQ-9B/P's & other Chinese advance ADS. What's more Su-30MKI flew unobstructed over Sargodha after pounding the airbase.

This is total air-dominance you imbecile. Now off with your Pakistani-Han propaganda.
You are so awesome. In 2019, India announced that a MiG-21 shot down an F16. Then Pakistan exhibited all 4 missiles of the MiG-21. In 2025, you announced that you shot down 7 Chinese planes and destroyed China's air defense missile system. The only evidence was a Pakistani small box truck painted in camouflage.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rajput Lion
It's a lock. IAF knows this. Only two counters exist for us in the next 5-10 years:

1. MKI UPG. with Virupaksha + Gandiva.

2. Su-57(single or customized tandem dual-seater) with Indian radar, IRST and MCs.

3. AMCA I adding this because I believe in the tweet of Prashant, manager of HTT bta , now in TATA .. he said in 3 years we could fly AMCA is we put the best men & resources into it.
Woman (allegedly) I have a degree in Engineering and a wealth of experience in busting Chinese BS.

While you are good at reading the China equivalent of Wikipedia you still didn’t comprehend the need for a strong intercept solution. From the behaviour of your systems looks like neither did their designers.

You are only partially correct that I m mocking the PL-15. I am also mocking you.

Finally if you can’t hit a man with a machine gun, do yourself a favor and use the gun on yourself. With your quality there is a good chance it will miss again

Please Ignore that person for peace of mind.

We don't want to see you wasting your time and precious post with that poster.