Operation Sindoor: India Strikes Terroist Camps Inside Pakitsan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jaymax said:
As per MB three ejections happened which saved lives

As per hellfire no pilots killed

Worst case three A/C lost. Could be less since PAF also uses MB on some of theirs. It could very well be that all losses were PAF. Since yesterday they have been ejecting disinformation from every orifice in their body.

Considering the fact that the entire Pak Defense circle knew India was coming and had literally every Air defense unit on high alert sone losses were to be expected. This wasn’t a sneak attack. It was telling the enemy we are coming and then hitting his beloved pets on his home ground.

I ll still wait for the official declaration. If we lost some we lost some. Have to take our losses and move ahead. But it could still be that IAF just lost sone UAVs and flattened Subhan Allah Masjid in Bahawalpur.
Click to expand...
I do not see any post from MB on ejections saving lives from today's action. Their last tweet is about the Super Hornet crash. Stop peddling misinfo
 
Shan said:
Please start a thread about this separately and show all data. I would urge members to actively read and discuss this over there. Let's see how rational and logical everyone is over there. Let's be cold and do the numbers. Go ahead Mr. Lolwa present your case. All the rest of the 5/2/3/10/20 lot can share their stuff as well.
Click to expand...
I won't ruin the thread. The *censored* wumao and Pakistani were screeching about the rafale shootdown and most of the other foreign sites have been successfully penetrated by Pakistani propaganda. The rafale and mirage shootdown was being discussed since midnight outside Indian eco-chambers. I did not believe initially but even that Iyer mitra and K singh handle also accepted it that there were aircraft losses on our side. The Bathinda loss is the only real proof because there is the image of the m-88. Plus tribune and hindustan times and dainik jagran also covered the death of 1 labourer and 9 injured due to the crash.
There have been two other crashes. One is likely the jf-17/f-16 interception by Akash AAD. The other one is jf-17/mirage 2000 crash with the black radome.
There is another crash that has been covered by Aaj tak which the *censored* shill said was a mig 29 upg.
So three are confirmed.

The Pakistanis have lost another mirage 3/5 within their own airspace most likely while trying to strike one of the airbases in Punjab.
The thing is there was a bigger airwar and about 60+ aircrafts were involved in total.
It's all speculation from my part.
 
Lolwa said:
Iyer mitra
Click to expand...
A nobody. He has no background in defence and in geopolitics. He is a social media influencer parading as a defence analyst. Please unfollow such gentlemen. The rest I can understand. India has it tough in the information sphere....there are a lot of specific countries that do not like you (understatement).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aniruddha
Manstrategist said:
A Rafale loss cannot be taken so lightly by the Pakistanis. it's probably an even more precious scalp than the MKI. Lets wait for official confirmation instead of relying on random pictures on X and over speculation. The JF17 loss looks far more believable to me.
Click to expand...
does not matter, rafale, f-22 anything can be lost in a war during first contact with enemy, what matters is adaptability to the situation and the most versatile party wins, lets hope IAF and Indian Military will be the ones who do it quicker.
 
Asterion Moloc said:
does not matter, rafale, f-22 anything can be lost in a war during first contact with enemy, what matters is adaptability to the situation and the most versatile party wins, lets hope IAF and Indian Military will be the ones who do it quicker.
Click to expand...
Well said sir. Polite applause.
 
Lolwa said:
I won't ruin the thread. The *censored* wumao and Pakistani were screeching about the rafale shootdown and most of the other foreign sites have been successfully penetrated by Pakistani propaganda. The rafale and mirage shootdown was being discussed since midnight outside Indian eco-chambers. I did not believe initially but even that Iyer mitra and K singh handle also accepted it that there were aircraft losses on our side. The Bathinda loss is the only real proof because there is the image of the m-88. Plus tribune and hindustan times and dainik jagran also covered the death of 1 labourer and 9 injured due to the crash.
There have been two other crashes. One is likely the jf-17/f-16 interception by Akash AAD. The other one is jf-17/mirage 2000 crash with the black radome.
There is another crash that has been covered by Aaj tak which the *censored* shill said was a mig 29 upg.
So three are confirmed.

The Pakistanis have lost another mirage 3/5 within their own airspace most likely while trying to strike one of the airbases in Punjab.
The thing is there was a bigger airwar and about 60+ aircrafts were involved in total.
It's all speculation from my part.
Click to expand...
So akash kill is verified? I said earlier in another thread few days ago that it's the Akash will be going to bring surprise.
 
Image_20222057531971.jpgImage_20213687327651.jpg

A new discovery has been made at the location previously thought to be Su-30 / mig-29. What is this? The second Rafale?

Image_20602104484066.jpg
 
Asterion Moloc said:
does not matter, rafale, f-22 anything can be lost in a war during first contact with enemy, what matters is adaptability to the situation and the most versatile party wins, lets hope IAF and Indian Military will be the ones who do it quicker.
Click to expand...
Tbf the rules of engagement seem to be to not attack any pakistani military assets. That's why they were able to sustain such aggressive posture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volcano and Asterion Moloc
Note to members. India's troll army is exaggerated. The Pakistanis' and the Chinese are doing a better job post the operation. Forums/sites/social media...everything is being covered well. They are doing a hell of a lot better than your information warfare units.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Lolwa and LX1111
Lolwa said:
Tbf the rules of engagement seem to be to not attack any pakistani military assets. That's why they were able to sustain such aggressive posture.
Click to expand...
what is done is done, now the RoE should be changed already and we should be having an idea of how enemy behaves, so better prepare and execute it when time comes. Should take out DA-20 and saab eeryie next
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shan
Ashwin said:
Members posting obvious Pakistani propaganda using old or AI images will not be tolerated and will be given infractions, which may lead to a permanent ban. Please be careful about what you share here.

cc @LX1111
Click to expand...
I remember the night of the Galwan Valley incident. The Indian forum basically had the same attitude, labeling everything as fake. If you think it's fake, then please tell me, what's the reason?
 
Asterion Moloc said:
what is done is done, now the RoE should be changed already and we should be having an idea of how enemy behaves, so better prepare and execute it when time comes.
Click to expand...
It was the same thing that happened in Balakot. Our RoE was to defend Indian airspace. It was only abhinandan who broke that and entered Pakistani airspace.
 
LX1111 said:
I remember the night of the Galwan Valley incident. The Indian forum basically had the same attitude, labeling everything as fake. If you think it's fake, then please tell me, what's the reason?
Click to expand...
You never cite a source article. don't just post pictures. hand on heart....did you lose soldiers in that confrontation? Or were there just 20...30 Indians dead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shetty-tejas
LX1111 said:
I remember the night of the Galwan Valley incident. The Indian forum basically had the same attitude, labeling everything as fake. If you think it's fake, then please tell me, what's the reason?
Click to expand...
If you have access to photos from supposed crash sites in India, its upto you to prove it
 
  • Like
Reactions: shetty-tejas
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom