I have been waiting for an opportune moment. I want to release some interesting documents that were leaked from the RAW office in India. It is rumored that the Indian Director of Defence Intelligence, General DS Rana, has been relieved of his position. This might confirm that at least some of these documents are true..
Pahalgam terror attack: 26 killed
- Thread starter Tatvamasi
- Start date
- Status
In my opinion India doesn't want POK, India also needs reason to keep Indians united so does Pakistan. Or else the ch**ts in our respected countries will divide in the name of region and language, this is a long term understanding between both India and Pakistan to keep it boiling.
You don't understand the situation then my dear. "Common people" in Pakistan do not own anything or any power, never had. Right now you do not even have a government answering to common people. It's not the common people of Pakistan that India is dealing with. It's the state of Pakistan, more specifically its armed forces that are an independent power in Pakistan with almost zero civilian control.
Unfortunately, the common people in Pakistan are forced to feed and support its forces via taxes. So, that makes, them a necessary target to destroy. Both Armed forces because they are existential threat to India and common people's economy in Pakistan because that is what feeds Pakistan military establishment, even if unwillingly.
And you are absolutely wrong to think that this "issue" will stop at Kashmir. For Pakistan's military establishment to thrive, it will need an enemy. Remember, what Munir said in his speech just before this incidence? "we are different from Hindus". Nothing stops at Kashmir. Nothing. Because for Pakistan's military to exist, it needs to justify its existence. If "Muslims are different from Hindus" as Munir said next will be Hyderabad. West Bengal. Mumbai.
So there is no option for India but to destroy Pakistan's military's war fighting capabilities. By destroying Pakistan's economy via Indus water redirection so that Pakistan's army looses financial inputs needed to secure weapons and equipment. And destroy Pakistan military by direct fighting or by covert means. Unfortunately, there is no other option left here.
Last edited:
This was expected. No surprises.
My head is still spinning from all that “LORA”, “PENETRATION”, “CUM BLAST” discussion above - thank heavens this is a defence forum
No. it's a statement to look "serious". After Hagseth's stupidities, MAGA needed to look a serious world leader. Nothing much.
The problem is you have been insane since before 1940's. The congress tried really hard to suppress hindu thought so you cockroaches literally got to live longer than you should otherwise we would have Gaza'd all of Pakistan and Bangladesh right now. When it comes to Yogi he will do what Modi was not capable of doing to you.Same time when you Hindutwa pigs become sane?
Yeah the Hindutwa crazy goin Yogi?
What he gonna do yoga is into extinction?
The atacms is a 300km missile. The LORA has a range of 430km. The atacms has 200kg warhead the LORA has 570 kg warhead. They are not even in the same class. The prahaar and heck the pinaka mk 3 are more similar to the atacms than the LORA which is closer to the iskander.
In very near future you will need way more military hardware. Fifth gen fighters, Ramjet missiles etc etc. The way your economy is going, you will end up destroying yourself financially that way. Works for India.
You started it. We just end it every single time.
Of course not. There's nothing in print.
NATO's units fight scripted wars focusing on coordination rather than adaptability and risk-taking. The Chinese are equally bad when it comes to how centralized they are, although their brigade structure makes them slightly more flexible in some cases. India is highly decentralized and take extreme risks, even going against the commands of centralized HQs.
You already saw how decentralized the system even at the lower rungs was by looking at Abhinandan's actions or what our troops did in Galwan. The latter took the Chinese by surprise because they were not prepared enough to understand that an Indian battalion can quite literally declare war on a country on its own. They probably assumed the Indian troops would have to withdraw and contact HQ for orders, like they would have to, and the orders would have been to yield.
Another example is 1967, Maj Gen Sagat Singh who commanded a division defied central govt and Army HQ orders and practically fought China on his own in Nathu La.
Otoh, like China, even Pakistan is extremely hierarchial. They have to obey centralized decision-makers. Probably are stricter than modern-day China at this.
Well, you are gonna have to empty the ones where you know terrorists are.
Anyway, a very big attack is coming.
Pakistan does not have that level of leverage in the air.
Think about it this way. Pakistan already has sufficient ammo of their own, so they don't need your support from day 1. By the time they need Chinese assistance, like NATO in Ukraine, most of Pakistan's ammo and weapons would have been depleted. And things would be a lot worse for them in the air by then. Either most of PAF would be underground to avoid destruction, like in 1971, or permanently grounded.
Neither country are in China's sphere of influence. Both are in India's.
Iran and India have come common enemies in the form of Turkey and Azerbaijan, both friends of China. Afghanistan's only real ticket to recognition is India and the US.
Similarly, over time, the Middle East will fall into India's sphere of influence along with large parts of Africa and SE Asia.
China's only leverage today is it's a bigger economic power. If that's all you have then you will lose. India's civilizational links are stronger.
I don't think so.
GOI will not do anything which harm the FDI. They want to attract run away Chinese to India due to tariff war. I strongly believe that China will be happy if we start war with pak now.
Oh, and is that why Russia's gone back to its brigade-division structure after actually fighting a modern war? And the Russians don't have just a division (12000), but they have an even larger unit called Army Corps (20000).
And oh, look, even the Americans are switching to divisions.
Army Shift from Brigades Back to Divisions Raises Concerns Among Retired Generals
Some worry that bringing the units back from the brigade to division level risks losing lethality at the point where it is most needed on the battlefield.
www.military.com
What are you talking about? Every armored division in India is supported by 2 infantry divisions. And every infantry division also has a regiment of tanks. And every armored division (plus two inf divisions) is also supported by an artillery division. But artillery, air support, EW etc are assigned as per need. There are also large independent units ready to merge with the divisions when necessary. Even RAPIDs are available as support.
Nothing will change until PA and ISI are reformed or gone. They own the country, not the citizens.
Lol, he got promoted to a command.
A&N is our lynchpin command to deal with PLAN. It's also our only tri-services command.
Generals that require punishment are retired, not given control of a command.
- Status